Exposure To Asbestos Lawsuit – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?

You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Exposure to asbestos lawsuit. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

J&J’s proposed settlement with talc would provide 400 million dollars to US state AGs. Exposure To Asbestos Lawsuit .

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has put the amount of $400 million for resolving U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of its larger $8.9 billion deal to settle claims that its Baby Powder and other talc-based products cause cancer. Exposure to asbestos lawsuit.

J&J company subsidiary LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday which outlines how the company will pay various types of cancer sufferers in bankruptcy settlement. Exposure to asbestos lawsuit. J&J has declared that its products containing talc are safe and do not cause cancer. It’s trying for another time to settle more than 38,000 lawsuits brought in bankruptcy and prevent new cases from arising in the future.
LTL’s bankruptcy plans would deposit $400 million into a separate trust for claims brought from state attorney generals claiming that J&J had violated the state’s unfair commercial practices and consumer protection laws by misleading consumers regarding the quality of its talc products.

A number of states had already initiated consumer protection lawsuits against J&J before LTL’s first bankruptcy filing stopped those investigations from progressing in 2021. Exposure to asbestos lawsuit. New Mexico and Mississippi had already filed actions with Johnson & Johnson before then, and the states of Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued civil investigative demands or subpoenas in LTL’s court documents.

 

 

New Mexico and Mississippi have moved to dismiss LTL’s bankruptcy in a joint move with cancer victims and their counterparts from the U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog. They have argued that a successful company like J&J cannot benefit from bankruptcy protections intended for the struggling debtors.
LTL’s first attempt at resolving the bankruptcy-related lawsuits was thrown out after similar arguments. A U.S. appeals court ruled the LTL was not in “financial distress” and thus not eligible to receive bankruptcy relief. Exposure to asbestos lawsuit. LTL declared bankruptcy a second time in just two hours following that dismissal, arguing that the second bankruptcy was different due to the fact that it had less money available and had a greater chance of securing a settlement.

New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion for dismissal that LTL’s latest bankruptcy violation of the state’s law enforcement authority in attempting to unilaterally limit the company’s liability for state consumer protection measures.

 

Exposure To Asbestos Lawsuit

LTL’s recent filings also provided more information on how the company would evaluate and settle cancer claims in the event that the bankruptcy plan is approved.

The maximum amount under the settlement will be $500,000 for those diagnosed with cancer of the mesothelioma ovary before age 45 and $260,000 for those who have been diagnosed with terminal ovarian cancer before age 45.

The proposed settlement will offer discounts based on the nature and severity of the cancer, the person’s age, previous usage of talc and other variables. Exposure to asbestos lawsuit. For instance someone who regularly used talc products weekly, had an ancestral history of ovarian cancer and was diagnosed with an ovarian cancer stage II when she was 55 might qualify for a $21,125 payment under the plan.

Judge gives order to J&J and talc oppositionists to engage in settlement talks.

Following another hearing in Johnson & Johnson’s effort to implement a Texas Two-Step bankruptcy strategy to resolve talc litigation, federal bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the company and those opposing the move to conduct negotiations to settle the matter, Bloomberg reports.

With its second bankruptcy attempt for LTL Management–a subsidiary established by J&J to hold the claims–the company made a settlement offer of $8.9 billion. Exposure to asbestos lawsuit. While one firm representing plaintiffs is in favor of the offer, another group opposes the deal.

This week, the opposition group, which is known as the Official Committee of Talc Claimants requested the bankruptcy court to disqualify the petition saying that LTL is not a factor to be in financial trouble.

“The filing is an incredibly legal and ineffective attempt by a small number of law firms to block claimants from voting on the resolution plan – a plan the vast and growing majority of claimants approve of,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in a statement. Exposure to asbestos lawsuit. “The law firms that are behind the filing are pursuing financial interests which do not align with, diverge from and infringe on the rights which their clientele. We’ll be submitting a response before the court of appeals.”

Exposure to asbestos lawsuit. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM which includes more than mesothelioma clients who have filed lawsuits against J&J, said that the second bankruptcy attempt of J&J will fail.

“J&J issues press releases describing how fantastic its plans are, but is insisting that the details of its plan–including the treatment individual sick people would actually receive–be kept secret,” Thompson said in the statement. “What does the company have to hide?”

 

Image Talcum Powder Lawsuit Lawyers

 

Kaplan has directed the parties to create a strategy for reorganization, under the oversight from two mediators.

In February 2022, Kaplan affirmed the ability of J&J’s use of Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that would relieve the company from the tens of thousands of claims related to its talcum-based products.

However, in the month of January, a federal appeals court ruled against the ruling, ruling that the company could not be considered to be in “financial trouble.”

In the event that J&J’s request to contest the U.S. Supreme Court was rejected in April, J&J applied for its first bankruptcy about two hours later. In response to that move, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 days to decide whether or not to accept to file for bankruptcy again.

J&J’s unstoppable profit engine sputters after $6.9B the talc litigation cost.

With the Two Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has gotten 19 months of which cases were put on hold. Exposure to asbestos lawsuit. The company wants claimants to take a vote to accept their settlement. J&J needs 75% acceptance for the deal to pass.

In addition to the team of talc attorneys who have panned the company’s bankruptcy play in the U.S. Trustee, the U.S. Trustee is an arm that is part of the U.S. Department of Justice, also filed motions to dismiss the second bankruptcy case of LTL.

In a statement this week, U.S. trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the doors of the bankruptcy court are “open to honest but unfortunate debtors.” The doors “are not accessible to those who do not have a legitimate bankruptcy goal or who seek to use the bankruptcy process to delay or hinder their creditors,” Vara continued.

On the other hand, J&J maintains there is no definitive evidence to suggest that its Talc products, which includes the famous baby powder, can cause cancer. J&J has adopted the products of the market, first for North America in 2020–and the remainder of the globe later this year.

J&J seeks to avoid the expense of going to court. The company has won most of the cases that were decided during trial, however, certain losses have been extremely severe.
A high-profile trial in Missouri led to a $4.7 billion verdict against the drug maker but was later reduced to $2.1 billion after appeals.

Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
In all, J&J has lost nine talc trials that are either being appealed or resolved. Out of 41 trials, 32 ended with an outcome for J&J, a mistrial or plaintiff verdict that was dismissed after appeal. Exposure to asbestos lawsuit. Additionally, the company in 2020 moved to settle more than 1000 cases at a cost of 100 million dollars, Bloomberg stated at the time.

 

Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Exposure To Asbestos Lawsuit

Our lawyers handle baby powder cases in every state. The talcum powder lawsuits on behalf of Johnson & Johnson have been going on for a long time. Exposure to asbestos lawsuit. The lawsuits contend that the prolonged use of the powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient in products such as Baby Powder or Shower to Shower and Shower to Shower, could cause ovarian cancer in certain women.

This page gives an J&J Talc Power litigation update and discusses how the upcoming bankruptcy ruling will impact the final settlement amount in the ovarian cancer lawsuits.

Have you reached the deadline by which you to start a lawsuit against talcum powder? Many who believe that the statute of limitations has run out to sue Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Call us now at 800-553-2082 or get a free and quick review of your case online.

 

Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Exposure To Asbestos Lawsuit

June 2 2023 Update: During an asbestos talc court trial held in California yesterday, a few technical issues halted the opening statements made by defense attorneys. Exposure to asbestos lawsuit. The jurors, attending at home via Zoom and hearing the Johnson & Johnson’s lawyer expressing skepticism about the 70s science asserting the presence of asbestos in their product before the proceedings abruptly ended.

Meanwhile, the plaintiff was able to present its first expert witness Arthur Langer. Langer said that the presence of other minerals with talc is inevitable. He testified that his team had notified J&J in the year 1971 about the presence of chrysotile asbestos in the talc of the company, but with just 0.1 percent. The asbestos was discovered by him in the year 1976.

June 1st, 2023 Update: Exposure to asbestos lawsuit. First trial after J&J made the decision to split its talc section and declaring bankruptcy marks an important turning point of the ongoing lawsuit story. The trial began on Tuesday in the heartbreaking case of a young 24-year-old plaintiff who was diagnosed with a rare and aggressive type of mesothelioma last year, a diagnosis lawyers on both sides believe is a tragedy of a different kind.

Opening statements revealed stark differences in each side’s narrative. The attorney for the plaintiff took aim towards Johnson & Johnson, alleging the use of deceitful methods in their research practices as well as throughout the litigation process. According to the attorney Johnson & Johnson attempted to alter asbestos’ definition, in spite of internal documents dating from the year 1978 and 1994 indicating that asbestos fibers in the tissue of the plaintiffs are included.

Johnson & Johnson’s uncertain $8.9 billion settlement offer hangs in the balance as we course of this trial. Despite the unique nature of this mesothelioma-related case and its unique challenges compared to the majority of talcum powder lawsuits, a verdict favoring the plaintiff could result in an enormous setback for J&J’s hopes for broad acceptance of their proposed settlement with plaintiffs.

May 31st 2023: Update from Johnson and Johnson’s bankrupt talc unit is defending its 2nd Chapter 11 filing in the in the face of challenges from victims of talc injuries. In an appeal to the New Jersey bankruptcy court, the subsidiary argued that the filing was fundamentally different from the first filing. It emphasized the unprecedented commitment to $8.9 billion from J&J the biggest settlement ever to be made in the history of a mass tort bankruptcy. Exposure to asbestos lawsuit. The issue is not discussed: whether the magnitude of the settlement means it is an equitable settlement. J&J also claimed that it received support from a variety of plaintiffs’ law firms representing more than the 60,000 plaintiffs. It is difficult to confirm but is probably incorrect.

May 24, 2023 Update: Since Johnson and Johnson’s bankruptcy filing in 2021 filing, the first trial involving its cosmetic talc products allegedly containing asbestos is set to start jury selection Monday in California at Alameda County Superior Court, an historically reliable court for plaintiffs. The plaintiff claims his mesothelioma resulted from asbestos exposure resulting from J&J’s products, an allegation the company has denied. The trial also involves six retailers who are accused of selling talc-containing products.

May 22nd, 2023 Update Lawyers involved in the second J&J Talc bankruptcy are in a dispute over who should be appointed to the role of future claims representative, an important role essential to the resolution of the claims involving talc. Exposure to asbestos lawsuit. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who is frequently involved in MDLs throughout the country was appointed the claims representative in the previous bankruptcy. J&J’s defense attorneys want Ellis to be appointed to that role and again, but attorneys for the talc plaintiffs are objecting because Ellis has a conflict of interest which should stop her from being appointed to that post again. The dispute stems from issue that Ellis was involved in drafting the controversially contested second bankruptcy, raising doubts about her ability to be neutral. The reality is this bankruptcy could be tossed out anyway.

May 17, 2023 Update: The pretend company that J&J created to handle the bankruptcy of talc has informed an New Jersey bankruptcy court that they have designated $400 million to pay the claims of states that accuse the company of deceitful advertising regarding its talc products. Exposure to asbestos lawsuit. So that makes it an $8.5 billion settlement for cancer patients. It’s hard to imagine any scenario in which J&J will be able to push the settlements of baby powder through in these figures. While J&J’s proposed $8.5 billion offer sounds like a lot of money initially, it will not look very appealing when you consider the math. The settlement plan based on our rough calculations would not be able to pay victims more than $100,000 per instance. This isn’t enough.

May 15th 2023 Update J&J is potentially facing a lawsuit brought by an advocacy group representing cancer victims. Exposure to asbestos lawsuit. The group argues that J&J deliberately retracted the $61.5 billion contract for funding together with its parent company, LTL Management LLC, to simulate financial distress and confirm the unit’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group asserts this action could be interpreted as a fraudulent transfer of rights of compensation for victims. They plan to explore J&J’s actions as a result of the decision to dismiss LTL’s first bankruptcy suit.

May 10, 2023 Update: Next week next week, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments on a petition to dismiss the second bankruptcy filing that was filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management. In the meantime, however, LTL Management has filed an order which requires both sides to take part in a second settlement mediation to see if an international settlement agreement can be brokered.

May 5, 2023 Update: The talc provider Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to numerous lawsuits alleging that its Talc products cause cancer due to asbestos exposure. Exposure to asbestos lawsuit. Over 2700 people have sued the firm, and it was paying $1 million per month to defend its legal position. The company’s latest $29 million verdict on the state of South Carolina forced it to pursue bankruptcy protection, and arguing for an equitable distribution of assets between talc claimants rather than being confiscated from the receiver. Other talc suppliers have also filed for bankruptcy due to the litigation.

May 4, 2023 update: U.S. The bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to relaunch settlement discussions with lawyers who have rejected Johnson & Johnson’s $8.9 billion agreement. In Trenton, New Jersey yesterday the parties gathered in court to discuss next steps in the second bankruptcy case. Judge Kaplan was pushing for more settlement discussions.

This is the solution to resolve these claims for J&J. A settlement for baby powder can be achieved. Exposure to asbestos lawsuit. But it will require more money, more billions of dollars – coming from Johnson & Johnson.

Lawyers are divided on whether or not to agree with the proposal and not all clients see the situation the same way their lawyer views it. The second bankruptcy case is likely to fail, as Judge Kaplan has scheduled a hearing for June to determine if she will remove the bankruptcy after the second.

May 3, 2023 Update A group of cancer victims who are suing Johnson & Johnson (J&J) demanded that the Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it is an attempt to derail the litigation surrounding talc-based products. The group representing the claimants made a motion Tuesday asking that the Third Circuit to consider their case and to send it back before a court of lower jurisdiction with instructions to discharge the bankruptcy. Exposure to asbestos lawsuit. The committee also requested that the stoppage of tort litigation against J&J should be permitted to continue.
LTL filed for Chapter 11 protection once again after its bankruptcy filing was rejected by the Third Circuit earlier this year and offered an $8.9 billion payment. The committee argues that the recent ruling which allowed the second Chapter 11 to continue, while also halting trials against J&J is a reason for an immediate Third Circuit review. The US Trustee has also requested be the New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s global vice president of litigation Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg saying that J&J intends to file a reply in the appeals court declaring the filing an “desperate and legally deficient attempt” by a few of law firms that have different financial interests.
May 1 2023 Update: One frequently asked question is how the plaintiffs’ lawyers and their clients turn around $8.9 billion. Of course, that is a lot of money. But there are plenty of victims. Exposure to asbestos lawsuit. And these are really good arguments for plaintiffs. We were reminded of this last week in two talc trials which resulted in big verdicts for the plaintiffs. In February, a talcum powder mesothelioma trial in Oregon ended in the verdict worth $18.1 million. A month later, another mesothelioma-related talc case went to trials at South Carolina and resulted in an award of $29 million for the plaintiff. It was the same defendant as in these cases: Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc., one of the most prominent suppliers of talc within the U.S.
April 30 2023 Update: J&J initially attempted to pull the litigation over talcum powder into bankruptcy, it came with an offer to reserve $2 billion for settlements. It was a ridiculously small amount. None of the talc plaintiffs supported it. However, this time, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 in the event that the talc victims agree to a bankruptcy settlement and they also have the backing of a significant section of the talc victims as well as their lawyers. Exposure to asbestos lawsuit. But with 75% of plaintiffs of talc are necessary for bankruptcy plan approval is not an easy task since there are so many lawyers with massive inventories of baby powder lawsuits opposed to the settlement.

What could solve the impasse? More billions.
April 25, 2023 Update Talc Cancer victims have requested a judge to disqualify the Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a absurdly fabricated Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, which claims that the business is not financially distressed. LTL has filed for Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby products caused cancer. Exposure to asbestos lawsuit. LTL was denied Chapter 11 in January. 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January and said that the company wasn’t eligible for bankruptcy relief as it had not demonstrated financial stress.

The claimants argue that LTL’s second Chapter 11 case is an fraud on the bankruptcy system and it’s being pursued in bad faith. J&J claims the bankruptcy settlement is backed by “significant backing” from firms representing approximately 60,000 plaintiffs. It’s fair to say that plaintiffs’ lawyers and the victims are split over this $8.9 billion deal.

April 21st, 2023 Update: A bankruptcy judge decided in favor of Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits alleging that the firm sold baby powder that was contaminated and causing cancer. While trials in the lawsuits involving talc are delayed for a minimum of 60 days, new lawsuits can be filed, and lawyers are able to begin preparing their cases. Exposure to asbestos lawsuit. The judge expressed skepticism over J&J’s absurd attempt to revive its plan with a second bankruptcy trial.

April 13th, 2023 Update: The big story is that there’s an $8.9 billion over the next 25 years settlement offer. Lawyers representing cancer victims within MDL class action MDL group action promised to fight the settlement with the talc claimants. Why? They feel it’s not enough to pay for those suffering from cancer who are 70,000. Exposure to asbestos lawsuit. The lawyers say that J&J should seek a bigger settlement or litigate individual claims in the event that the latest bankruptcy is thrown out.

But there is another lawyer group that isn’t part of the leadership group in this class action. The lawyers collectively have accumulated hundreds of thousands of cases. They want to settle today in what many believe to be far less than what these victims deserve. Their argument seems to be twofold. First, they argue that the settlement – which amounts to the equivalent of $100,000 per plaintiff is fair.

That is a hard argument to make. But their second argument has more force: victims should not afford to wait any longer and need to get their money right now.

April 12, 2023 Update: People are asking how J&J is able to file for bankruptcy again. The answer is complicated and complicated. But let’s try to explain it in simple terms.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only means to settle both present and future talc-related lawsuits definitively. In other words, it thinks it can get a lower rate in the event of a bankruptcy component that applies pressure for a settlement. Exposure to asbestos lawsuit. Driving past hundreds of years of American history, the company argues that bankruptcy benefits all parties by distributing settlements more fairly and effectively than trial courts, in which some litigants receive substantial settlements while others get nothing.

The basic tenet of this 3rd Circuit decision was this is not a case – the profit-making company that has subsidiaries to meet the legal responsibility and declare bankruptcy Congress considered when it was drafting the Bankruptcy Code. However, it also stated the company was in financial difficulty because J&J promises unlimited funding.
So J&J did not hesitate to take advantage of the unlimited funding part of the deal and didn’t make any promises that it would provide unlimited funds for cases. The company says that its revised financing arrangements with its subsidiary addresses the appeals court’s concerns while still supplying funds for claim payments. In the hope that offering victims less money would solve the underlying issue.

Lawyers representing cancer patients who oppose the deal counter this argument by saying that it is the legal argument. Exposure to asbestos lawsuit. They counter with legal nonsense: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion in assets away from LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s earlier decision. Hyperbole is not exempt by the victims’ lawyers, who call it the largest “fraudulent move of assets in United States history.”

Despite all the legal jargon, J&J does not really believe that this bankruptcy will last. It is however a method of trying to push this $8.9 billion settlement to keep the pressure on plaintiffs.

April 10 2023 Update Bloomberg has an interesting report on a brand new law in New Jersey that is shedding new light on litigation funding in the suit for class actions. Funders for litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson (J&J) over talc products in exchange for a portion of any winnings. J&J has now offered an offer of $8.9 billion to settle all lawsuits.

The involvement of funders is public knowledge due to a New Jersey court rule requiring the disclosure of certain information about outside funding backers. The rule aims to address the rising calls for regulation of the litigation funders. J&J is facing more than 60,000 claims when you include state and federal infant powder litigation. Third-party funding in mass tort claims has pros and pros and. However, there is no doubt that we are seeing how third-party funding could level the playing field between people as well as large corporations in the courtroom.

April 4, 2023 Update: It is interesting to watch the worm turning in this litigation. J&J suffered another setback this week, when an appeals court in the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to maintain the automatic stay while J&J appeals a bankruptcy ruling at the U.S. Supreme Court. This automatic stay stopped thousands of talcum cases and stopped new lawsuits from getting filed ever since J&J launched the controversial attempt to spin the talc liabilities into a bankrupt entity over a year earlier. Exposure to asbestos lawsuit. After it was decided that the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was not legal some months ago, the stay was lifted. J&J had hoped to have it continue in the meantime of its SCOTUS appeal. However, the answer was no.
April 1, 2023 Update: Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. There is a chance that is that the Supreme Court is willing even to accept the appeal? Low.
March 16th, 2023 Update: with the bankruptcy stay having been in effect, the first new cases were filed and incorporated into the talcum powder class action MDL within a year. Seven new talc lawsuits have been joined to the MDL in the last month, bringing the total number of cases pending to 37,522.

February 25, 2023 Update This morning, a Congressmen from Tennessee is now requesting that the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) begin an investigation into how much J&J talc products have cost the government in the years.
Recently, in an open letter addressed to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) accused J&J of ignoring the dangers of its talc product for years while tax dollars were utilized to treat people injured by exposure to the product. The lawsuit comes just a few weeks after J&J’s loss to the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Exposure to asbestos lawsuit. J&J has to begin making reasonable settlement offers to victims to begin getting this behind. It is a stain on one of the top firms.

February 14 2023 Update: In the hearing held today in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention to follow the ruling of 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.

 

You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Exposure to asbestos lawsuit. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

 

  • How Will Johnson And Johnson Lawsuit – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • Health Dangers Of Talc – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • Is Talc Safe On Skin – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • Gold Bond Talc Free Body Powder – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • Hillsbourough County Florida Radio Ad For Men Going Through A Divorce With Children – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • How To Join Johnson And Johnson Lawsuit – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • Talco Johnsons Cancer – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • Online Dating Before Divorce – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Can You Live Together In State Of Florida And Still Be Divorce From Each Other – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • How To Get Copy Of Divorce Decree Online – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  •  

  • Terms of Use
  • Free Do It Yourself Divorce Forms
  • Finding A Good Divorce Lawyer
  • Privacy Policy
  •  

    >>> Exposure To Asbestos Lawsuit

    You May Also Like