Johnson And Johnson Ovarian Lawsuit – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?

You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Johnson and Johnson ovarian lawsuit. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

J&J’s proposed talc settlement would make payments of 400 million dollars to US state AGs. Johnson And Johnson Ovarian Lawsuit .

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has put the amount of $400 million for resolving U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of a wider $8.9 billion deal to settle allegations that it’s Baby Powder as well as other talc product causes cancer. Johnson and Johnson ovarian lawsuit.

J&J subsidiaries LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday that describes how the company intends to pay different types of cancer victims as part of bankruptcy settlement. Johnson and Johnson ovarian lawsuit. J&J has declared that its talc products are safe and don’t cause cancer. J&J is seeking the second time to end more than 38,000 lawsuits brought in bankruptcy and prevent new cases from arising in the near future.
The bankruptcy plan of LTL would pay $400 million to a separate trust for lawsuits filed by state attorneys general alleging that J&J did not comply with the state’s unfair commercial practices as well as consumer protection laws through misleading consumers regarding the safety of its talc products.

A number of states had already initiated consumer protection cases against J&J before LTL’s first bankruptcy filing prevented those investigations from taking place in 2021. Johnson and Johnson ovarian lawsuit. New Mexico and Mississippi had already initiated suits against Johnson & Johnson before then and states like Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued civil investigative subpoenas or demands in LTL’s court documents.

 

 

New Mexico and Mississippi have filed a petition to end LTL’s bankruptcy in a joint move with cancer victims as well as their counterparts from the U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog, who have argued that a successful company like J&J can’t benefit from bankruptcy protections intended for those struggling with debt.
The company’s initial attempt to resolve the lawsuits in bankruptcy was dismissed after similar arguments. A U.S. appeals court ruled that LTL had not been in “financial difficulty” and therefore not eligible under bankruptcy law. Johnson and Johnson ovarian lawsuit. LTL made a new bankruptcy application less than two hours after the dismissal, arguing its second attempt was different as it had less money available and more support for the possibility of settling.

New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion for dismissal that LTL’s renewed bankruptcy violates the law enforcement powers of the state by trying to unilaterally cap LTL’s liability to state consumer protection laws.

 

Johnson And Johnson Ovarian Lawsuit

LTL’s new filings also included more information about how the company would assess and pay claims for cancer should the bankruptcy plan be approved.

The highest payments under the settlement will be $500,000 for patients diagnosed with cancer of the mesothelioma ovary before age 45, and $260,000 for those who have been diagnosed with terminal ovarian cancer before age 45.

The proposed settlement applies discounts depending on the type and severity of cancer, an individual’s age, the history of usage of talc and other variables. Johnson and Johnson ovarian lawsuit. For instance the case of a woman who used daily talc products, had the family history of ovarian cancer and was diagnosed with Stage II cancer of the ovary at age 55 might qualify for a $21,125 payment under the settlement plan.

Judge orders J&J and talc opponents to discuss settlement negotiations.

After another round of hearings in Johnson & Johnson’s effort to employ a Texas Two Step bankruptcy strategy to resolve talc litigation, federal bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the company and those opposed to the move to conduct negotiations to settle the matter, Bloomberg reports.

With its second bankruptcy attempt for LTL Management–a subsidiary established by J&J to manage the claims company made a settlement offer of $8.9 billion. Johnson and Johnson ovarian lawsuit. While a firm representing plaintiffs is in favor of the settlement, a different group opposes the move.

The previous week, the opposition group, known as the Official Committee of Talc Claimants in the bankruptcy court, demanded to disqualify the petition arguing that LTL can not be considered financially distressed.

“The filing is a desperate and legally deficient attempt by a handful of law firms to stop claimants from voting on the resolution plan, a plan the vast majority of claimants support,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in a statement. Johnson and Johnson ovarian lawsuit. “The law firms who filed their filing are financially oriented and have conflicts that do not align with, diverge from and infringe on the rights that their customers. We’ll be submitting a response to the appellate court.”

Johnson and Johnson ovarian lawsuit. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM that is home to more than patients with mesothelioma who have sued J&J claimed that the company’s second bankruptcy try will fail.

“J&J publishes press release about how wonderful the plan is but simultaneously insisting that the details of its plan–including the treatment the individual sick individuals would receive,” Thompson said in a statement. “What do J&J have to cover up?”

 

 

Kaplan has directed the parties to develop a new reorganization plan, under supervision and supervision of mediators.

In February 2022, Kaplan confirmed J&J’s use of Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that would free J&J from the tens of thousands of claims concerning its talcum products.

But in January of this year, a federal appeals court overturned the ruling, ruling that the company could not be considered to be in “financial trouble.”

When J&J’s attempt to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court was dismissed at the end of April J&J was granted a second petition for bankruptcy two hours after. In response to that move, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 days to decide whether to allow the second bankruptcy.

J&J’s unstoppable profit machine sputters after $6.9B talc litigation charge.

With 2 Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has gotten 19 months of which the cases were held. Johnson and Johnson ovarian lawsuit. The company wants claimants to decide whether they want to accept the settlement. J&J needs 75% of the vote for the settlement to be approved.

Alongside the group of talc attorneys who have panned the bankruptcy of the company as well, the U.S. Trustee which is a division belonging to the U.S. Department of Justice has also filed an application to dismiss LTL’s bankruptcy second case.

In a statement this week, U.S. Trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the the bankruptcy court remain “open to honest, but naive debtors.” The doors “are not open to any parties who do not have a legitimate bankruptcy purpose or that seek to use bankruptcy to hinder or delay their creditors.” Vara continued.

For its part, J&J maintains there is no proof conclusive that their products containing talc, such as its iconic baby powder, can cause cancer. J&J has been taking the products of the market–first on North America in 2020–and the rest of the world next year.

J&J intends to steer clear of the cost of going to court. It has won most of the cases that have been decided through trial, though some losses have been punitive.
A highly publicized trial in Missouri led to a $4.7 billion verdict against the drug maker but was later reduced to $2.1 billion following appeals.

Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
Overall, J&J has lost nine trial cases in talc which are in appeal or concluded. Out of 41 trials 32 ended with a win by J&J either through a mistrial or plaintiff verdicts that were reversed after appeal. Johnson and Johnson ovarian lawsuit. Additionally, the company in 2020 moved to settle around 1,000 cases worth $110 million. Bloomberg announced at that time.

 

Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Johnson And Johnson Ovarian Lawsuit

Our lawyers are handling baby powder cases in every state. The talcum powder lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson have been in the process for several years. Johnson and Johnson ovarian lawsuit. The lawsuits claim that the long-term use of the powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient in many products, including baby Powder along with Shower to Shower as well as other products, may cause cancer of the ovary in certain women.

This page provides the J&J Talc Power Update and explains how the forthcoming bankruptcy ruling impacts the ultimate settlement amount in these cases of ovarian cancer.

Have you reached the deadline by which you to make a claim for talcum powder? Many who believe the time limit has expired to file a lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Call us today at 800-553-8082 or request a no-cost and quick case review online.

 

Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Johnson And Johnson Ovarian Lawsuit

June 2, 2023 Update: During the asbestos talc case which took place in California yesterday, some technical glitches interrupted the opening statements of the defense attorneys. Johnson and Johnson ovarian lawsuit. The jurors, attending from home via Zoom but did not hear Johnson & Johnson’s lawyer voice his doubt about the 70s research asserting the presence of asbestos in their product prior to the session abruptly ended.

In the meantime, the plaintiff could introduce an initial witness Arthur Langer. Langer explained that the occurrence of other minerals alongside the talc mineral is a given. He testified that his team advised J&J in the year 1971 of the presence of asbestos chrysotile in the talc of the company, but with lesser than 0.1 percent. He also discovered more asbestos in 1976.

June 1st, 2023 Update: Johnson and Johnson ovarian lawsuit. A trial for the first time since J&J made the decision to split its Talc segment and file for bankruptcy marks an important point of the ongoing lawsuit controversy. Trial started on Monday in the harrowing case of a young 24 year-old plaintiff, diagnosed with an aggressive and rare form of mesothelioma in the past year, which both sides acknowledge is a tragedy of a different kind.

Opening statements revealed the sharp differences in the two sides’ narrative. The attorney representing the plaintiff aimed his ire at Johnson & Johnson, alleging the use of misleading strategies in its research practices as well as throughout the litigation process. As per the lawyer Johnson & Johnson attempted to alter asbestos’ definition, despite internal documents dating back to between 1978 and 1994 that showed asbestos fibers in the plaintiff’s tissue are included.

Johnson & Johnson’s uncertain $8.9 billion settlement offer hangs in the balance with the development of the trial. Despite the distinctive nature of the mesothelioma trial and its distinct issues compared to the majority of talcum powder lawsuits, a verdict favoring the plaintiff could inflict an unintended setback to Johnson & J’s expectations of widespread acceptance of their proposed settlement among plaintiffs.

May 31, 2023: Update from Johnson & Johnson’s bankrupt talc unit strongly defended their Second Chapter 11 filing in the opposition of talc injury claimants. In a written objection to the New Jersey bankruptcy court, the company argued that the filing was distinct from the first filing. It also emphasized the unprecedented commitment to $8.9 billion from J&J as the biggest settlement ever to be made in the history of a mass tort bankruptcy. Johnson and Johnson ovarian lawsuit. It was not mentioned how this amount means it is an equitable settlement. J&J also claimed support from numerous plaintiffs’ law firms representing over sixty thousand claimants. This is difficult to verify but likely incorrect.

May 24 2023 Update: In the wake of Johnson & Johnson’s bankruptcy in 2021 filing, the very first trial concerning its cosmetic talc products allegedly with asbestos content is scheduled to commence jury selection on Monday, May 24, California at Alameda County Superior Court, an historically reliable location for plaintiffs. The plaintiff asserts that his mesothelioma is the result of asbestos exposure through J&J’s products which that the company is denying. The trial also involves six retailers who are accused of selling talc-containing products.

May 22nd, 2023 Update Lawyers involved in the 2nd J&J talc bankruptcy are now in a dispute over who should be chosen to fill the post of future claims representative, which is vitally essential in resolving the Talc claims. Johnson and Johnson ovarian lawsuit. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who frequently appears in MDLs all over the nation, was appointed as the claims representative in the initial bankruptcy. J&J’s defense team wants Ellis to be appointed to this position and again, but attorneys for the plaintiffs in talc are arguing due to the fact that Ellis has conflicts of interest which would prohibit her from taking on that role for the second time. The dispute stems from fact that Ellis was involved in the drafting of the highly contested second bankruptcy, raising doubts about her capacity to be neutral. In reality, this bankruptcy is likely to be dismissed in the end.

May 17, 2023 Update: The pretend company that J&J created to settle the talc litigation bankruptcy has informed the New Jersey bankruptcy court that they have designated $400 million to settle the claims brought by states accusing J&J of misleading marketing for its talc products. Johnson and Johnson ovarian lawsuit. That’s an $8.5 billion settlement for cancer victims. It’s difficult to imagine any scenario in which J&J can get the settlements of baby powder through with these numbers. While J&J’s proposed $8.5 billion offer seems like a huge sum initially, it may not appear appealing after you calculate the figures. The proposed settlement based on our rough calculations – would not pay victims much more than a median settlement of $100,000 per case. That’s not enough.

May 15 2023 Update J&J could be facing lawsuit from an advocacy group representing cancer patients. Johnson and Johnson ovarian lawsuit. The group claims J&J intentionally canceled the $61.5 billion financing agreement in conjunction with its affiliate, LTL Management LLC, to create the appearance of financial hardship and verify the unit’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group claims that this move is a fraud transfer of rights of compensation for victims. They intend to investigate J&J’s actions as a result of the decision to dismiss LTL’s first bankruptcy suit.

May 10 2023 Update: The following week, it is expected that the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments regarding a motion to reject the second bankruptcy filing that was filed by J&J subsidiaries LTL Management. However, in the meantime LTL Management has filed an Order which requires both sides to take part in a settlement mediation in the hope that the global settlement can be brokered.

May 5 2023 Update: Talc manufacturer Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to many lawsuits claiming that its talc products cause cancer from asbestos exposure. Johnson and Johnson ovarian lawsuit. More than 2700 people have filed lawsuits against the firm and it has been spending $1 million a month to defend its legal position. The company’s most recent $29 million settlement on the state of South Carolina forced it to pursue bankruptcy protection, and arguing that assets should be distributed in an equitable manner between the claimants of talc instead of being confiscated by the receiver. Other suppliers of talc have filed for bankruptcy due to lawsuits.

May 4, 2023 Update U.S. bankruptcy judge Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to relaunch talks with lawyers who rejected the proposed $8.9 billion deal. It was in Trenton, New Jersey yesterday, the parties gathered in court to discuss the next steps to take in this second case of bankruptcy and Judge Kaplan encouraged further settlement talks.

This is the best way to settle these claims for J&J. A baby powder settlement can be achieved. Johnson and Johnson ovarian lawsuit. However, it’ll require additional money – perhaps billions of dollars by Johnson & Johnson.

Lawyers are split on whether to accept the proposal and not every client views the issue in the same manner their lawyer sees it. The second bankruptcy case is bound to be a failure and Judge Kaplan has scheduled a hearing for June to decide whether to remove the bankruptcy after the second.

May 3, 2023 Update: A group of cancer patients who have sued Johnson & Johnson (J&J) requested an order from the Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it attempts to block the litigation surrounding talc-based products. The committee representing talc claimants submitted a motion on Tuesday requesting that the Third Circuit to consider their appeal and return the case to a lower court, with instructions for dismissing the bankruptcy. Johnson and Johnson ovarian lawsuit. They also asked that lawsuit against the halted torts of J&J be allowed to proceed.
LTL applied for Chapter 11 protection once again following its bankruptcy filing that was denied in the Third Circuit earlier this year and offered a $8.9 billion deal. The committee believes that the recent ruling, which allows LTL’s 2nd Chapter 11 to continue, as well as halting the trials against J&J, warrants immediate Third Circuit review. The US Trustee also asked that an New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s vice president for global litigation Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg saying that J&J plans to file a reply in the appeals court saying that the filing is an “desperate and legally insufficient plan” by a small number of law firms that have conflicting financial interests.
May 1st 2023 Update: A question people keep asking is how could plaintiffs and their attorneys turn around $8.9 billion. Of course, that’s an enormous amount of money. But there are a lot of victims. Johnson and Johnson ovarian lawsuit. These are an excellent case for plaintiffs. We were reminded of this last week when two talc cases led to huge verdicts for plaintiffs. In February the mesothelioma case involving talcum powder trial in Oregon resulted in a verdict that was $18.1 million. The following month, a second mesothelioma trial involving talc was held for the court in South Carolina and resulted in an award of $29 million for the plaintiff. Both cases were defended by Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc. one of the top producers of talc in the U.S.
April 30th, 2023 Update: When J&J initially attempted to pull the talcum powder litigation into bankruptcy, it was met with the option of putting aside $2 billion for settlements. It was a ridiculously small amount. None of the talc plaintiffs supported the proposal. This time, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 in the event that the talc victims are willing to accept bankruptcy settlements and they also have the support of a large portion of the talc plaintiffs and their lawyers. Johnson and Johnson ovarian lawsuit. But with 75% of plaintiffs who are a talc, which is required to approve bankruptcy plans, it a tough road because of the number of lawyers who have massive stocks of baby powder lawsuits opposed to the settlement.

What could solve the impasse? More billions.
April 25 2023 update: Talc Cancer victims have requested a judge to disqualify the Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a absurdly-made-up Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, insisting that the company is not financially troubled. LTL requested Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby powders cause cancer. Johnson and Johnson ovarian lawsuit. The 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January The court ruled that the company was not eligible for bankruptcy relief since it did not show financial stress.

The claimants argue that the third Chapter 11 case is an abuse of the bankruptcy system and the case is being handled in bad good faith. J&J asserts that the bankruptcy settlement has “significant backing” from firms representing approximately 60,000 people who are claiming. It’s safe to say that the plaintiffs’ attorneys and victims ‘ lawyers are divided on what they believe is an $8.9 billion offer for settlement.

April 21, 2023 Update: A bankruptcy judge has decided the company Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits alleging that it sold baby powder that was contaminated and causing cancer. Although trials for the talc lawsuits have been suspended for a minimum period of 60 days however, new lawsuits may be filed and lawyers may begin to prepare their cases. Johnson and Johnson ovarian lawsuit. The judge expressed his doubts about J&J’s attempt to revive its strategy with a second bankruptcy trial.

April 13 2023 Update: most important announcement is an $8.9 billion over the next 25 years settlement offer. Lawyers representing cancer victims within the MDL group action vowed to fight the settlement along with Talc claimants. Why? They argue that it’s not enough to pay for more than 70,000 cancer victims. Johnson and Johnson ovarian lawsuit. They argue that J&J should negotiate a bigger settlement or even litigate individual claims in the event that the latest bankruptcy is dismissed.

But there’s a separate group of lawyers outside of the leadership in this class action. The lawyers collectively have accumulated many thousands of cases. This group wants to settle today with what they believe is lower than what the victims should be paid. Their argument appears to be two-fold. First, they argue the settlement – which amounts to an average of $100,000 per plaintiff is fair.

This argument isn’t easy to present. But their second argument has more teeth: victims can now not wait and they want the money immediately.

April 12, 2023 Update: People are looking for ways J&J can go through bankruptcy again. The answer is complicated and convoluted. Let’s try to simplify it simply.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only way to settle both present and future lawsuits involving talc conclusively. That is, it believes that it will be less expensive when there is a bankruptcy component that applies pressure to negotiate a settlement. Johnson and Johnson ovarian lawsuit. Going back to hundreds of years of American past, the company claims that bankruptcy benefits all parties as it distributes settlements more equally and more efficiently than trial courts where some litigants receive significant awards while others receive nothing.

The main thrust of this 3rd Circuit decision was this is not a case – an enterprise that is profitable, forming an affiliate to accept the legal risk and declare bankruptcy Congress thought of when drafting its Bankruptcy Code. It also clarified that the subsidiary was not in financial trouble because J&J assured it of unlimited funding.
Then J&J did not hesitate to take advantage of the unlimited funding portion of the holding and didn’t promise to provide unlimited funding for the litigation. J&J claims that its new financing agreements with its subsidiary address the appeals court’s concerns while still offering claim payment funds. As if providing victims with lesser money could solve the underlying issue.

Lawyers representing cancer patients who oppose the agreement counter this argument by saying that it is countering legal nonsense legal nonsense: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion in assets to LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s earlier decision. Hyperbole did not go unnoticed by the victims’ lawyers, who call it the biggest “fraudulent move ever in United States history.”

In spite of the legal jargon, J&J does not really believe this bankruptcy will be able to last. However, it’s a means to try and push the $8.9 billion settlement through and maintain the pressure on plaintiffs.

April 10 2023 update: Bloomberg provides an insightful report on a brand new law within New Jersey that is shedding new light on litigation funding in the plaintiffs in the class action. Funders of litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of claims against Johnson & Johnson (J&J) on behalf of talc products. They exchanged for a share of any profits. J&J is now offering to pay $8.9 billion to settle lawsuits.

The funders’ involvement is made public due to an New Jersey court rule requiring the disclosure of certain information about funding sources outside of the. This rule is intended to address the growing calls for the regulation of litigation funders. J&J faces over 60,000 claims when you take into account federal and state infant powder litigation. Third-party funding of mass tort cases has pros and pros and. There is no doubt that we are witnessing how third-party funding could level the playing field for individuals as well as large corporations in the courtroom.

April 4 2023 Update: It’s pleasing to see the worm turn in this lawsuit. J&J took another hit this week when the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to continue the automatic stay during the time that J&J appeals a bankruptcy ruling before the U.S. Supreme Court. Automatic stays have frozen thousands of talcum cases and stopped new lawsuits from arising ever since J&J started the controversial process to spin the talc debts into a bankrupt entity over one year earlier. Johnson and Johnson ovarian lawsuit. After it was decided that the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was not legal only a few months back, the stay was revoked. J&J wanted to see it continued pending its SCOTUS appeal. But, no.
April 1, 2023 Update: Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. The chance of the Supreme Court is willing even to take up the appeal? Low.
March 16th 2023 Update: with the bankruptcy stay in effect, the first new cases were filed and incorporated into the talcum powder class action MDL in the space of a year. Seven new talc lawsuits have been joined to the MDL during the month of March, bringing the total number of cases that are pending to 37,522.

February 25, 2023 Update: A Congressmen from Tennessee has now demanded that authorities from the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) initiate an investigation into the cost J&J products containing talc have cost the government in the many years.
Recently, in an open letter to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) accused J&J of ignoring the risks of its talc product for decades while tax dollars were spent treating those injured by exposure to the products. The suit comes just a few days after J&J’s loss to the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Johnson and Johnson ovarian lawsuit. J&J must begin making fair settlement offers to victims, in order in putting this behind it. It is a stain on one of the top companies.

February 14 2023 Update: During a hearing today at the hearing in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention to follow his 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.

 

You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Johnson and Johnson ovarian lawsuit. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

 

  • Can I Online Divorce In Illinois Online – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Online Divorce Filing Oklahoma – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Divorce Online Search Cullman Times Al – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Online Women’s Divorce Support Groups – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Online Dating And Divorce Rates – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Watch Divorce Season 2 Episode 1 Online Free Megavideo – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Lake County Il Divorce Records Online – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Why Do You Find Asbestos In Talc – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • Michigan Divorce Papers Sent Online – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Can You Find Divorce Papers Online – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  •  

  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • About
  • Free Do It Yourself Divorce Forms
  • Disclosure
  •  

    >>> Johnson And Johnson Ovarian Lawsuit

    You May Also Like