Paramiters To Be Talc Ovarian Cancer – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?

You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Paramiters to be talc ovarian cancer. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

J&J’s proposed talc settlement will provide 400 million dollars to US state AGs. Paramiters To Be Talc Ovarian Cancer .

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has put aside $400 million to resolve U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of its larger $8.9 billion effort to settle allegations that its Baby Powder as well as other talc products cause cancer. Paramiters to be talc ovarian cancer.

J&J subsidiaries LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday that outlines how the firm intends to pay different types of cancer sufferers in the bankruptcy settlement. Paramiters to be talc ovarian cancer. J&J has declared that its talc products are safe and will not cause cancer. It is attempting for another time to settle more than 38,000 lawsuits in bankruptcy, and to prevent any new cases from coming forward in the future.
The bankruptcy plan of LTL would pay $400 million into an additional trust to settle lawsuits filed by state attorneys general alleging that J&J had violated the state’s unfair commercial practices and consumer protection laws through misleading consumers about the security of its talc-based products.

Many states had initiated consumer protection cases against J&J prior to the first bankruptcy filing prevented those investigations from progressing in 2021. Paramiters to be talc ovarian cancer. New Mexico and Mississippi had already filed actions in the past against Johnson & Johnson before then and states like Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued subpoenas or civil investigative demands according to court documents.

 

 

New Mexico and Mississippi have moved to dismiss LTL’s bankruptcy as well as cancer patients and the U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog. They have argued that a successful company such as J&J cannot benefit from bankruptcy protections designed for struggling debtors.
The first attempt by LTL to resolve the bankruptcy lawsuits was dismissed following similar arguments. In the end, a U.S. appellate court ruled that LTL was not in “financial distress” and was not eligible of bankruptcy protection. Paramiters to be talc ovarian cancer. LTL filed a second bankruptcy in just two hours following that dismissal, arguing that its second attempt was different because it had less money and had more support for the possibility of settling.

New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion for dismissal that LTL’s latest bankruptcy violation of the law enforcement powers of the state by trying to unilaterally cap LTL’s liability to state consumer protection actions.

 

Paramiters To Be Talc Ovarian Cancer

LTL’s recent filings also provided more information on how the company would evaluate and pay for cancer claims in the event that the bankruptcy plan is approved.

The most significant payments under the settlement would be $500,000 for patients diagnosed with cancer of the mesothelioma ovary before the age of 45, and $260,000 for those who have been diagnosed with ovarian cancer that is terminal before age 45.

The proposed settlement provides discounts based on the type and severity of cancer, the patient’s age, previous using talc and other factors. Paramiters to be talc ovarian cancer. For instance, a woman who used talc products on a weekly basis, who had an ovarian cancer family history, cancer and was diagnosed with the stage 2 ovarian cancer at the age of 55 might qualify for a $21,125 payment under the program.

Judge decides J&J and talc oppositionists to discuss settlement negotiations.

After another round of hearings in Johnson & Johnson’s attempt to implement a Texas Two-Step bankruptcy strategy to resolve talc litigation and federal bankruptcy judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the firm and the people who opposed the strategy to engage in settlement talks, Bloomberg reports.

With its second bankruptcy bid for LTL Management, a subsidiary set up by J&J to manage the claims company offered a settlement of $8.9 billion. Paramiters to be talc ovarian cancer. While a group of law firms representing plaintiffs supports the offer, another group is against the settlement.

In the last week, an opposition group, dubbed”the Official Committee of Talc Claimants, urged the bankruptcy court for dismissal of the matter by arguing that LTL cannot be regarded as in financial distress.

“The filing is an unjust and legally flawed attempt by a tiny number of law firms to try to stop claimants from voting on the resolution plan – a plan the vast and growing majority of claimants favor,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in a statement. Paramiters to be talc ovarian cancer. “The law firms involved in their filing are financially oriented and have conflicts that are in conflict with, diverge from, and contravene those which their clientele. We’ll be submitting a response to the appellate court.”

Paramiters to be talc ovarian cancer. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM, which is home to more than mesothelioma victims who have sued J&J and J&J, has said that the company’s second bankruptcy try will fail.

“J&J sends out press releases about how wonderful its plan is, while insisting that the details of its plan–including the treatment individuals with illnesses would receive–be kept secret,” Thompson said in an email. “What is J&J’s plan to keep secret?”

 

 

Kaplan has instructed the sides to develop a new arrangement plan under supervision and supervision of mediators.

The court in February of 2022 Kaplan confirmed J&J’s recourse to Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that would relieve J&J from the thousands of lawsuits regarding its talcum products.

In the month of January, an appeals court in the United States overturned the verdict, ruling that the company was not able to be considered in “financial distress.”

When J&J’s attempt to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court was denied on April 1, J&J was granted a second petition for bankruptcy two hours after. In response to that move, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 days to decide whether to grant to file for bankruptcy again.

J&J’s unstoppable profit engine goes out of control after $6.9B the talc litigation cost.

With the two Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has been able to buy 19 months in which cases were placed in limbo. Paramiters to be talc ovarian cancer. The company would like claimants to decide whether they want to accept the settlement. J&J would need 75% of the vote for the settlement to be approved.

Alongside the group of talc lawyers who criticised the bankruptcy of the company, the U.S. Trustee, an arm that is part of the U.S. Department of Justice, also filed motions to dismiss LTL’s bankruptcy second case.

In a letter filed this week, U.S. Trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the bankruptcy courts are “open to honest but unfortunate debtors.” Those doors “are not open to any parties that do not have a legitimate objective or seek to use the bankruptcy process to delay or hinder their creditors.” Vara continued.

To its credit, J&J maintains there is no proof conclusive that their Talc-based products, such as its popular baby powder cause cancer. J&J has taken its products off of the market–first to be available in North America in 2020–and the rest of the world later this year.

J&J intends to steer clear of the costly business of going to trial. J&J has won most of the cases that were decided through trial, though certain losses have been extremely punishing.
A highly-publicized trial in Missouri ended in an $4.7 billion judgment against the drug manufacturer, which was later reduced to $2.1 billion after appeals.

Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
Overall, J&J has lost nine trial cases in talc which are appealing or settled. In 41 trials 32 have ended in winning for J&J, a mistrial or verdict for a plaintiff that was reversed upon appeal. Paramiters to be talc ovarian cancer. Separately, the company in 2020 sought to settle over 1,000 cases worth $110 million. Bloomberg reported at the time.

 

Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Paramiters To Be Talc Ovarian Cancer

Our lawyers are handling baby powder lawsuits in all 50 states. The lawsuits involving talcum powder in the case of Johnson & Johnson have been in the process for several years. Paramiters to be talc ovarian cancer. The lawsuits allege that prolonged use of talcum powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient in products such as Baby Powder along with Shower to Shower which can cause ovarian cancer among some women.

This page provides a J&J talc power litigation update and provides an overview of how the upcoming bankruptcy ruling will impact the final settlement amounts of the ovarian cancer lawsuits.

Has the deadline passed for you to file a talcum powder lawsuit? Many people who think the statute of limitations has run out to file a lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Contact us now at 800-553-8082 or get a no-cost, quick case review online.

 

Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Paramiters To Be Talc Ovarian Cancer

June 2 2023 Update: During the asbestos talc case which took place in California yesterday, technical issues halted the opening statements of the defense lawyers. Paramiters to be talc ovarian cancer. Jurors who were watching at home via Zoom however, heard Johnson & Johnson’s lawyer voice his skepticism about the 70s science that claimed asbestos was present in their product before the proceedings abruptly ended.

Meanwhile, the plaintiff had the opportunity to introduce the first of their witnesses, Arthur Langer. Langer stated that the presence of other minerals with the talc mineral is a given. He said that his team advised J&J in 1971 of the presence of chrysotile asbestos within the talc manufactured by the company, though in just 0.1 percent. He also uncovered more asbestos in the year 1976.

June 1st, 2023 Update: Paramiters to be talc ovarian cancer. This is the first court trial that has taken place since J&J took the decision to disband its Talc division and declare bankruptcy is an important point of the ongoing litigation story. Trial began yesterday in the heartbreaking case of a young 24 year-old plaintiff who was diagnosed with an aggressive and rare form of mesothelioma last year. an illness that lawyers on both sides acknowledge is a grave tragedy.

Opening statements revealed the distinct differences between each side’s narrative. The attorney for the plaintiff took aim on Johnson & Johnson, alleging the use of misleading tactics in research practices and throughout the litigation procedure. In the words of attorney Johnson & Johnson attempted to alter asbestos’ definition, in spite of internal documents from 1978 and 1994 showing that fibers discovered in the tissue of the plaintiffs are included.

Johnson &J’s highly uncertain $8.9 billion settlement proposal hangs in the balance with the development of the trial. Despite the distinctive nature of the mesothelioma trial and its distinct issues compared to other lawsuits involving talcum powder, a verdict favoring the plaintiff could be an unintended setback to Johnson & J’s hopes for broad acceptance of their proposed settlement with plaintiffs.

May 31 2023: Update from Johnson and Johnson’s bankrupted talc unit has is defending the two-time Chapter 11 filing in the in the face of challenges from injured talc claimants. In an objection submitted to the New Jersey bankruptcy court, J&J’s subsidiary claimed that the situation was distinct from the first filing. It also emphasized the unprecedented commitment to $8.9 billion by J&J which is the largest settlement ever made in an bankruptcy case involving mass torts. Paramiters to be talc ovarian cancer. It was not mentioned how this amount signifies that it’s an equitable settlement. J&J also claimed support from numerous plaintiffs’ law firms representing over 60,000 claimants. This is difficult to verify but likely incorrect.

May 24 2023 Update: As of Johnson &J Johnson’s bankruptcy filing, the first trial on its cosmetic talc items allegedly comprised of asbestos is set to start jury selection Monday, May 24, California with Alameda County Superior Court, a historically good location for plaintiffs. The plaintiff asserts that his mesothelioma was caused by asbestos exposure through J&J’s products, an allegation J&J denies. The trial also includes six retailers accused of selling talc products.

May 22, 2023 Update: Lawyers in the 2nd J&J talc bankruptcy are disputing who should be chosen to fill the role of future claims representative, a role that is critically essential in resolving the talc claims. Paramiters to be talc ovarian cancer. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who is frequently involved in MDLs all over the nation, was appointed as the claims representative in the initial bankruptcy. J&J’s defense attorneys want Ellis to be appointed to this position in the future, however lawyers representing the talc plaintiffs are protesting due to the fact that Ellis has an interest conflict which should stop her from holding that position once more. The dispute stems from issue that Ellis was apparently involved in the creation of the hotly litigated second bankruptcy, which raises concerns about her capacity to be neutral. However, the reality is that this bankruptcy will likely to be dismissed in the end.

May 17, 2023 Update: The fake company J&J put together for the talc bankruptcy told a New Jersey bankruptcy court that they have set aside $400 million to settle the claims brought by states accusing J&J of misleading marketing for its talc-based products. Paramiters to be talc ovarian cancer. So that makes it an $8.5 billion settlement for cancer victims. It’s hard to imagine the scenario in which J&J can get the settlements of baby powder through in these figures. While J&J’s proposed $8.5 billion offer might seem like a large sum initially, it may not appear appealing when you look at the numbers. The settlement plan based on our rough calculations would not be able to pay victims more than a median settlement of $100,000 per instance. This isn’t enough.

May 15, 2023 update: J&J might be facing lawsuit brought by an advocacy group that represents cancer victims. Paramiters to be talc ovarian cancer. The group contends that J&J deliberately withdrew a $61.5 billion funding agreement together with its parent company, LTL Management LLC, in order to create a false sense of financial distress and verify the unit’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group claims this decision amounts to a fraudulent transfer of the rights of compensation for victims. They intend to investigate J&J’s actions in the wake of the denial of LTL’s first bankruptcy suit.

May 10 2023 Update: During the next week next week, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments on a motion to dismiss the second bankruptcy filing from J&J subsidiary LTL Management. In the meantime, this bankruptcy court has issued an Order requiring both sides to take part in a new settlement negotiation with the hopes of achieving an international settlement agreement can be come to fruition.

May 5, 2023 Update: Talc provider Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to many lawsuits claiming that its talc products cause cancer due to asbestos exposure. Paramiters to be talc ovarian cancer. Over 2700 people have sued the company and it is paying $1 million per month for legal defense. The company’s most recent $29 million settlement that was handed down in South Carolina forced it to pursue bankruptcy protection, and arguing for an equitable distribution of assets between talc claimants rather than being seized in the hands of the receiver. Other talc suppliers have also declared bankruptcy because of the litigation.

May 4, 2023 Update U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to restart settlement discussions with lawyers who rebuffed the company’s proposed $8.9 billion agreement. It was in Trenton, New Jersey yesterday, the parties appeared before a judge to discuss the next steps in the second bankruptcy case. Judge Kaplan pushed more settlement talks.

This is the solution to resolve these claims for J&J. A baby powder settlement can be achieved. Paramiters to be talc ovarian cancer. However, it’ll require more money – more billions of dollars – by Johnson & Johnson.

Lawyers are split on whether to take the proposal or not and not every client views the issue the same way their lawyer views it. This second case of bankruptcy is likely to go nowhere as Judge Kaplan has set a date for a hearing in June to decide if he will remove the bankruptcy after the second.

May 3, 2023 Update A group of cancer patients suing Johnson & Johnson (J&J) asked for the Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it attempts to block litigation regarding talc-related products. The committee representing talc claimants has filed a motion this week requesting for the Third Circuit to consider their case and to send it back before a court of lower jurisdiction with instructions to dismiss the bankruptcy. Paramiters to be talc ovarian cancer. They also asked that the stoppage of tort litigation against J&J be allowed to continue.
LTL filed for Chapter 11 protection once again after its bankruptcy filing was denied by the Third Circuit earlier this year, offering an $8.9 billion deal. The committee says that the recent ruling allowing LTL’s second Chapter 11 to continue, while also halting trials against J&J is a reason for immediate Third Circuit review. The US Trustee requested it be requested that the New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s worldwide vice president of litigation, Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg declaring that J&J intends to file a reply to the appeals court saying that the filing is a “desperate and legally inadequate move” by a few of law firms with conflicting financial interests.
May 1, 2023 Update: One frequently asked question is how plaintiffs and their attorneys turn down $8.9 billion. Of course, it’s a lot of money. But there are a lot of victims. Paramiters to be talc ovarian cancer. And these are really good cases for plaintiffs. We were reminded of this recently with two talc trials have resulted in huge verdicts for plaintiffs. In February mesothelioma, a talcum-based powder trial in Oregon was settled with a verdict of $18.1 million. The following month, a second talc mesothelioma case went to trials within South Carolina and resulted in the verdict of $29 million to the plaintiff. In both instances, the defendant was Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc. one of the most prominent suppliers of talc in the U.S.
April 30 2023 Update: When J&J first attempted to drag the talcum powder lawsuit into bankruptcy, it did so with the option of putting aside $2 billion for settlements. The amount was absurdly low. There was no one among the talc victims who supported the offer. This time, however, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 in the event that the talc victims agree to a bankruptcy settlement and they have the support of a large portion of the talc plaintiffs and their lawyers. Paramiters to be talc ovarian cancer. But with 75% of plaintiffs of talc are necessary for bankruptcy plan approval, it a tough road since there are so many lawyers with large collections of baby powder lawsuits opposed to the settlement.

What are the solutions to the impasse? More billions.
April 25, 2023, Update Talc cancer claimants have requested a judge to disqualify the Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a absurdly fabricated Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, which claims that the business is not financially troubled. LTL requested Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby products caused cancer. Paramiters to be talc ovarian cancer. LTL was denied Chapter 11 in January. 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January in a ruling that said LTL was not a candidate to receive bankruptcy relief because it was unable to demonstrate financial trouble.

The claimants argue that the 2nd Chapter 11 case is an overreach of the bankruptcy system and that it’s being pursued in bad good faith. J&J says the bankruptcy settlement is backed by “significant backing” from companies representing about 60,000 potential claimants. It is fair to say that plaintiffs’ lawyers and victims ‘ lawyers are not united over the $8.9 billion amount of settlement offered.

April 21st, 2023 Update: A bankruptcy judge ruled in favor of Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits alleging that the company sold tainted baby powder causing cancer. Although the trials for talc lawsuits are paused for a minimum period of 60 days, new lawsuits can be filed, and lawyers are able to begin preparing their cases. Paramiters to be talc ovarian cancer. Judges expressed skepticism about J&J’s attempt to revive its plan with the second bankruptcy case.

April 13th 2023 Update: The big update is about the $8.9 billion over the course of 25 year period settlement offered. Lawyers representing cancer victims in the MDL class action have pledged to fight the settlement alongside talc claimants. Why? They argue that it’s not enough money for 70 000 cancer patients. Paramiters to be talc ovarian cancer. They argue that J&J could negotiate a greater settlement or even litigate individual claims if the most recent bankruptcy is dismissed.

However, there is a second set of lawyers who are not part of the leadership in that class action. The lawyers collectively have accumulated many thousands of cases. The group is seeking to settle today with what they believe is far less than what these victims deserve. Their argument seems to be two-fold. First, they argue the settlement – about 100 million dollars on average per plaintiff – is fair.

This argument isn’t easy to prove. However, their second argument has more force: victims should not afford to wait any longer and need their money now.

April 12, 2023 Update: People are wondering if J&J can go through bankruptcy again. The answer is complex and confusing. But let’s try to explain it in simple terms.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only way to deal with both present and future talc lawsuits conclusively. It thinks it will pay less in the event of an element of bankruptcy that puts pressure to negotiate a settlement. Paramiters to be talc ovarian cancer. Moving past hundreds of years of American past, the company asserts that bankruptcy benefits all parties by distributing settlement payments more equitably and efficiently than trial courts, where litigants are awarded significant award while others do not.

The basic tenet of this 3rd Circuit decision was this is not a case of a profitable company making a subsidiary to take the legal responsibility and declare bankruptcy, which is what Congress contemplated when drafting the Bankruptcy Code. It also clarified it was not in financial difficulty due to the fact that J&J promises unlimited funding.
Thus, J&J jumped on the funding unlimited part of the holding and didn’t promise to fund unlimited the litigation. The company says that its modified financing arrangements with its subsidiary addresses the appeals court’s concerns while still offering claim payment funds. It’s as if giving victims less money would solve the underlying issue.

Lawyers representing cancer patients who do not agree with the agreement counter the agreement with what is a defense against legal nonsense by pointing out legal absurdity: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion in assets to LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s previous ruling. Hyperbole was not spared: victims’ lawyers call it the most significant “fraudulent deal of assets in United States history.”

Despite all the legal jargon, J&J does not really believe that this bankruptcy will last. But it is a way to push for this $8.9 billion settlement through and maintain the pressure on plaintiffs.

April 10 2023 Update Bloomberg offers an informative article about a new law in New Jersey that is shedding new light on litigation funding in the baby powder class action lawsuit. Funders for litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of claims that were brought against Johnson & Johnson (J&J) concerning talc products in exchange in exchange for a portion of wins. J&J is now offering an offer of $8.9 billion to settle any lawsuits.

The funders’ involvement is public knowledge due to the New Jersey court rule requiring the disclosure of certain information about funding sources outside of the. The rule aims to address the growing calls for the regulation of litigation funders. J&J is facing more than 60,000 claims when you combine federal and state baby powder lawsuits. Third-party funding of mass tort cases is not without its pros and cons. There is no doubt that we are seeing the ways that third-party funding can even the playing field between individual and big corporations in the courtroom.

April 4 2023 Update: It’s enjoyable to see the worm turning in this litigation. J&J has taken another blow this week, when an appeals court in the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to keep the automatic stay in place in the meantime that J&J appeals an appeal before the U.S. Supreme Court. This automatic stay halted the cases of talcum powder in a number of years and stopped any new lawsuits from arising ever since J&J began the controversial plan to spin the talc liabilities into a bankrupt subsidiary over one year back. Paramiters to be talc ovarian cancer. When it was decided that the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was not legal some months ago, the stay was lifted. J&J was hoping to have it continued pending hearing the SCOTUS appeal. But, no.
April 1st, 2023 Update: Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. The likelihood that of the Supreme Court is willing even to hear the appeal? Low.
March 16, 2023 Update: with the bankruptcy stay fully lifted, the first new cases were filed and incorporated into the talcum powder class action MDL in over one year. Seven new talc-related lawsuits were added to the MDL over the last month increasing the number of cases that are pending to 37,522.

February 25 2023 Update: A Congressmen from Tennessee has now demanded that be the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) initiate an investigation into the cost J&J product containing talc has cost the government in the decades.
A recent email to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) has accused J&J of not recognizing the risks of its talc-based products for long while tax dollars utilized to treat people injured by exposure to the chemicals. The lawsuit comes just a few weeks after J&J’s loss to the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Paramiters to be talc ovarian cancer. J&J needs to start making reasonable settlement proposals to victims to begin to put all of this behind. It is a stain on one of the most prestigious companies.

February 14 2023 Update: At an appearance today at the hearing in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention in light of the third U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.

 

You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Paramiters to be talc ovarian cancer. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

 

  • Best Online Divorce For Hawaii – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • How To File An Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • Fiesta Online Collaborative Divorce – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • How To Get Free Divorce Papers Online – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Massachusetts Online Legal Divorce – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • How To File Online For A Divorce In South Carolina – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Johnson And Johnson Ethicon Settlements – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • Johnson And Johnson Mesh Settlement – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • Johnson’s Talc Powder – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • How Do I Get My Name Of The Morgage After A Divorce In Florida – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  •  

  • Privacy Policy
  • About
  • Free Do It Yourself Divorce Forms
  • Disclosure
  •  

    >>> Paramiters To Be Talc Ovarian Cancer

    You May Also Like