You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Talc asbestos. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

J&J’s proposed settlement with talc would provide $400 million to US state AGs. Talc Asbestos .

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has put aside $400 million to settle U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of its broader $8.9 billion plan to settle allegations that it’s Baby Powder as well as other talc products cause cancer. Talc asbestos.

J&J affiliate LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday that outlines how the firm will pay various types of cancer victims in an arrangement for bankruptcy. Talc asbestos. J&J has claimed that its products containing talc are safe and won’t cause cancer. It’s trying for the second time to end more than 38,000 lawsuits brought in bankruptcy, as well as prevent new lawsuits from being filed in the future.
LTL’s bankruptcy plans would deposit $400 million to an additional trust to settle claims brought from state attorney generals claiming that J&J had violated the state’s unfair commercial practices and consumer protection laws by misinforming consumers about the security of its talc-based products.

Some states had started consumer protection cases against J&J prior to the time that LTL’s bankruptcy filing prevented those investigations from taking place in 2021. Talc asbestos. New Mexico and Mississippi had already launched suits with Johnson & Johnson before then as well as the states of Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued subpoenas or civil investigative demands, according to LTL’s court papers.

New Mexico and Mississippi have filed a petition to end LTL’s bankruptcy along with cancer sufferers as well as the U.S. Justice Department’s watchdog on bankruptcy, who have claimed that a lucrative company like J&J does not qualify for bankruptcy protections intended for people with debt problems.
The company’s initial attempt to resolve the bankruptcy lawsuits was rejected after the same arguments. In the end, a U.S. appeals court decided it was not LTL wasn’t in “financial distress” and was not eligible under bankruptcy law. Talc asbestos. LTL had filed for bankruptcy again within two hours of the dismissal, saying that the second bankruptcy was different because it had less money available and had more support for the possibility of settling.

New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion for dismissal that LTL’s renewed bankruptcy violates the law enforcement powers of the state by trying to unilaterally cap LTL’s liability to state consumer protection actions.

Talc Asbestos

The filings of LTL’s latest bankruptcy proceedings also include more details on the way in which the company will evaluate and pay cancer claims in the event that the bankruptcy plan is approved.

The maximum amount under the settlement would be $500,000 for people diagnosed with mesothelioma that is terminal before age 45. Talc asbestos. The second payment would be $260,000 for those who have been diagnosed with ovarian cancer that is terminal before age 45.

From there, the proposed settlement provides discounts based on the kind and severity of cancer, an individual’s age, previous using talc and other factors. Talc asbestos. For example the case of a woman who used talc products weekly, had the family history of ovarian cancer and was diagnosed Stage II cancer of the ovary at age 55 may qualify for a $21,125 payment according to the plan.

Judge gives order to J&J, talc opponents to take part in settlement talks.

After another round of hearings in Johnson & Johnson’s effort to implement a Texas Two-Step bankruptcy strategy to resolve talc litigation, federal bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the company and those opposed to the strategy to engage in settlement talks, Bloomberg reports.

With its second bankruptcy attempt for LTL Management, a subsidiary set up by J&J to handle the claims company proposed a settlement of $8.9 billion. Talc asbestos. While one group of law firms representing plaintiffs is in favor of the offer, another group opposes the move.

The previous week, the opposition group, dubbed”the Official Committee of Talc Claimants in the bankruptcy court, demanded to disqualify the petition by asserting that LTL is not considered to be in financial hardship.

“The filing is a desperate and legally deficient attempt by a few of law firms to try to block claimants from voting on the resolution plan, a plan that the vast majority of claimants support,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in an announcement. Talc asbestos. “The law firms that are behind the filing are pursuing financial interests which clash with, diverge from, and contravene those of their clients. We’ll soon submit a response an appeal to the appellate court.”

Talc asbestos. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM which is home to more than mesothelioma patients who have sued J&J, said that the company’s second bankruptcy try will fail.

“J&J issues press releases about how great its plan is, while insisting that the plan’s details, including what the individual sick individuals would receive — be kept private,” Thompson said in the statement. “What does the company have to cover up?”

Kaplan has instructed the sides to devise a second arrangement plan under supervision by two mediators.

As of February 2022 Kaplan acknowledged J&J’s recourse to Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that would free J&J from the hundreds of thousands of claims over its talcum products.

However, in January of this year, an appeals court in the United States overturned the verdict, ruling that the firm could not be considered in “financial difficulty.”

After J&J’s contest the U.S. Supreme Court was denied the same month, J&J filed for its second bankruptcy just two hours after. In response to that move, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 days, allowing the company to decide whether to allow another bankruptcy.

J&J’s unstoppable profit engine sputters after $6.9B talc litigation charge.

Through 2 Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has gotten 19 months of which cases were put on hold. Talc asbestos. J&J wants the claimants to accept their settlement. J&J needs 75% of the vote for the settlement to be approved.

In addition to the group of talc lawyers who criticised LTL’s bankruptcy plan and the U.S. Trustee which is a division of the U.S. Department of Justice, also filed an appeal to dismiss LTL’s bankruptcy second case.

In a letter filed this week, U.S. Trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the doors of the bankruptcy court are “open to honest but unfortunate debtors.” These doors “are not accessible to those who do not have a legitimate bankruptcy reason or want to abuse the bankruptcy process to hinder or delay their creditors.” Vara continued.

In its own words, J&J maintains there is no proof conclusive that their products containing talc, such as its iconic baby powder, cause cancer. J&J has adopted the products of the market, first on North America in 2020–and the rest of the world this year.

J&J is determined to stay clear of the cost of going to court. It has won the majority of the cases that have been resolved during trial, however, certain losses have been punishing.
A highly publicized trial in Missouri resulted in a $4.7 billion verdict against the drug maker and was later lowered to $2.1 billion after appeals.

Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
Overall, J&J has lost nine trial involving talc that are in appeal or concluded. Of the 41 trials, 32 have resulted in a win by J&J either through a mistrial or verdict of a plaintiff overturned on appeal. Talc asbestos. Additionally, the company in 2020 sought to settle more than 1,000 cases worth 100 million dollars, Bloomberg stated at the time.

Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Talc Asbestos

Our lawyers handle baby powder cases in all 50 states. The talcum powder lawsuits for Johnson & Johnson have been going on for a long time. Talc asbestos. The lawsuits contend that the prolonged use of talcum powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient in many products, including baby Powder as well as Shower to Shower, can cause ovarian cancer in some women.

This page gives an J&J talc power litigation update and examines how the coming bankruptcy ruling will impact the final settlement amount in the Ovarian Cancer lawsuits.

Has the deadline passed for you to bring a talcum lawsuit? Many people who think the time limit has expired to sue Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Call us now at 800-553-2082 or get a no-cost, quick review of your case online.

Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Talc Asbestos

June 2 2023 Update: At the trial for asbestos-containing talc at the trial in California yesterday, technical glitches interrupted the opening statements made by defense lawyers. Talc asbestos. Jurors watching from their homes via Zoom and hearing the Johnson &Johnson’s lawyer express doubt about the science of the 70s asserting the presence of asbestos in their product prior to the trial was abruptly closed.

The plaintiff could introduce their first witness, Arthur Langer. Langer explained that the existence of additional minerals along with the talc mineral is a given. He testified that his team informed J&J in 1971 of the presence of chrysotile asbestos in the talc produced by the company, although in less than 0.1 percent. He also discovered more asbestos in the year 1976.

June 1, 2023 Update: Talc asbestos. A trial for the first time since J&J has decided to separate its talc division, and then declare bankrupt marks an important point within the ongoing lawsuit saga. The trial began on Tuesday in the tragic trial of a young plaintiff who was diagnosed with a rare and aggressive form of mesothelioma last year. an illness that lawyers on both sides of the argument agree is a harrowing tragedy.

The opening statements exposed the sharp differences in the two sides’ story. The attorney representing the plaintiff took aim at Johnson & Johnson, alleging the use of deceitful techniques in its research practices and throughout the litigation procedure. According to the attorney, the company tried to manipulate the definition of asbestos, despite internal documents from between 1978 and 1994 that showed asbestos fibers that were found in the plaintiff’s tissue are included.

Johnson &J’s tangled $8.9 billion settlement offer hangs in the balance with the development of the trial. Despite the distinct nature of the mesothelioma trial and the unique issues it faces compared to most talcum powder lawsuits, a verdict favoring the plaintiff could result in a serious setback to J&J’s hopes for broad acceptance of their proposed settlement among plaintiffs.

May 31st, 2023 Update: Johnson & Johnson’s bankrupt talc unit strongly defended its second Chapter 11 filing in the opposition of victims of talc injuries. In an opposition filed with the New Jersey bankruptcy court, the subsidiary argued that the situation differed fundamentally from the prior filing. It emphasized the unprecedented commitment of $8.9 billion to J&J the largest settlement ever made in an bankruptcy case involving mass torts. Talc asbestos. Not mentioned: how the amount of the settlement indicates that it is an equitable settlement. J&J also claimed support from various plaintiffs’ law firms representing more than 600,00 claimants. This is hard to verify however it is likely to be incorrect.

May 24 2023 Update: As of Johnson & Johnson’s bankruptcy in 2021 filing, the first trial involving its cosmetic talc products that are believed to containing asbestos is set to start jury selection on Monday, May 24, California at Alameda County Superior Court, which is a well-known court for plaintiffs. The plaintiff claims his mesothelioma is the result of asbestos exposure resulting from J&J’s products which that the company has denied. The trial also includes six retailers who are accused of selling talc-based products.

May 22nd, 2023 Update Lawyers involved in the second J&J talc bankruptcy are now fighting over who should be chosen to fill the post of future claims representative, which is vitally important to resolving the Talc claims. Talc asbestos. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who regularly appears in MDLs throughout the United States was appointed the claims representative in the initial bankruptcy. J&J’s defense team wants Ellis to be named to the position in the future, however lawyers representing the talc plaintiffs have raised objections due to the fact that Ellis has an interest conflict that would prevent her from holding that position again. This conflict is rooted in the reality that Ellis was involved in the creation of the hotly disputable second bankruptcy, which raises concerns about her capacity to be neutral. However, the reality is that the bankruptcy will be dismissed regardless.

May 17, 2023 Update The fake company J&J put together for the talc litigation bankruptcy informed a New Jersey bankruptcy court that they had allocated $400 million to settle allegations made by states who accuse the company of deceitful advertising for its talc products. Talc asbestos. It’s a $8.5 billion settlement for cancer sufferers. It is hard to imagine a scenario where J&J could push the baby powder settlements at these numbers. Although J&J’s $8.5 billion offer might seem like a lot at first, it does not appear appealing when you look at the numbers. This settlement offer based on our estimates – will not offer victims anything more than $100,000 per instance. It’s not enough.

May 15, 2023 Update J&J is potentially facing a lawsuit from an advocacy group representing cancer patients. Talc asbestos. The group argues that J&J intentionally withdrew a $61.5 billion funding agreement that it had with its company subsidiary LTL Management LLC, to create the appearance of financial hardship and validate the unit’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group argues that this act could be interpreted as a fraudulent transfer of the rights of compensation for victims. They will investigate J&J’s actions in the wake of the decision to dismiss LTL’s first bankruptcy suit.

May 10 2023 Update: Next week next week, next week, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments regarding a motion to dismiss the second bankruptcy application of J&J LTL Management, J&J’s subsidiary. LTL Management. In the meantime LTL Management has filed an order requiring both sides to take part in a settlement mediation hoping that an international settlement agreement can be been reached.

May 5, 2023 Update: Talc supplier Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to numerous lawsuits alleging its talc products caused cancer from asbestos exposure. Talc asbestos. Over 2,700 people have sued the firm and the company was paying $1 million per month on legal defense. The company’s recent $29million settlement in South Carolina forced it to pursue bankruptcy protection, and arguing for equitable distribution of assets to talc claimants, rather than being taken over in the hands of the receiver. Other suppliers of talc have declared bankruptcy because of the litigation.

May 4 2023 Update U.S. Court of Bankruptcy Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to restart negotiations with lawyers who turned down the proposed $8.9 billion agreement. In Trenton, New Jersey yesterday the parties appeared in court to discuss the next steps for the second bankruptcy case and Judge Kaplan pushed more settlement talks.

This is the way to resolve the claims of J&J. The baby powder settlement is likely to be made. Talc asbestos. However, it’ll require more money, more billions of dollars coming from Johnson & Johnson.

Lawyers are split on whether to accept the proposal and not all clients view the issue in the same manner their attorney does. Second bankruptcy cases are expected to fail and Judge Kaplan has scheduled a hearing for June to determine if she will discharge the bankruptcy for the 2nd time.

May 3, 2023 Update The group of cancer victims who are suing Johnson & Johnson (J&J) demanded to have the Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it attempts to block litigation over talc products. The group representing the claimants filed a motion on Tuesday asking the Third Circuit to consider their case and then send it back an earlier court with instructions for dismissing the bankruptcy. Talc asbestos. They also requested that the halted tort litigation against J&J be allowed to proceed.
LTL requested Chapter 11 protection once again following its bankruptcy filing that was denied in the Third Circuit earlier this year, offering an $8.9 billion payment. The committee says that the recent ruling, which allows LTL’s 2nd Chapter 11 to continue, in addition to halting trials against J&J should be subject to immediate Third Circuit review. The US Trustee requested an New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s vice president for global litigation, Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg declaring that J&J intends to file a statement in the appeals court, saying that the filing is a “desperate and legally inadequate plan” by a few of law firms that have conflicting financial interests.
May 1st 2023 Update: A common question that people ask is how plaintiffs and their lawyers turn down $8.9 billion. Of course, that’s quite a sum. But there are plenty of victims. Talc asbestos. These are actually a good case for plaintiffs. We have been reminded of this recently with two talc trials led to huge verdicts for plaintiffs. In February, a talcum powder mesothelioma trial in Oregon ended in an award that was $18.1 million. A month later, another talc mesothelioma case went to trial at South Carolina and resulted in a verdict of $29million in favor of plaintiff. The defendant in both cases was Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc. one of the largest suppliers of talc within the U.S.
April 30 2023 Update: When J&J first attempted to drag the litigation over talcum powder into bankruptcy, it did so with the option of putting aside $2 billion for settlements. The sum was ridiculously low. The talc plaintiffs had not supported it. However, this time, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 If the talc plaintiffs will allow a bankruptcy settlement and also has the backing of a significant segment of the talc plaintiffs as well as their lawyers. Talc asbestos. However, 75% of plaintiffs in the talc category, which is required to approve bankruptcy plans, it a tough road due to the sheer number of lawyers with massive inventory of baby powder litigations opposed against the proposed settlement.

What could solve the impasse? More billions.
April 25 2023 Update Talc cancer claimants have requested a judge to disqualify their Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a absurdly fabricated Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, insisting that the company is not financially troubled. LTL filed for Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby-powders caused cancer. Talc asbestos. It was the 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January, saying the company was not eligible for bankruptcy relief as it was unable to demonstrate financial trouble.

The claimants contend that the Second Chapter 11 case is an abuse of the bankruptcy system and it is being pursued in bad faith. J&J claims the bankruptcy settlement has “significant backing” from companies representing about 60,000 potential plaintiffs. It is fair to say that plaintiffs’ lawyers and the victims are split over their disagreement over the $8.9 billion settlement offer.

April 21, 2023 Update: A bankruptcy judge decided that Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits claiming that the company sold baby powder that was contaminated and causing cancer. Even though trials for the talc lawsuits have been suspended for a minimum of 60 days but new lawsuits can be filed and lawyers may begin to prepare their cases. Talc asbestos. Judges expressed skepticism about J&J’s ridiculous effort to revive its strategy by filing a second bankruptcy case.

April 13th 2023 Update: The big announcement is an $8.9 billion over the next 25 years of settlement. Lawyers representing cancer patients within MDL class action MDL collective action vowed to fight the settlement with the talc claimants. Why? They feel it’s not enough money for 70 000 cancer patients. Talc asbestos. The lawyers say that J&J should negotiate a larger settlement or settle individual claims if the most recent bankruptcy is thrown out.

However, there is a second set of lawyers who are not part of the leadership group in that class action. The lawyers collectively have accumulated the equivalent of tens of thousands of lawsuits. This group wants to settle today for what is believed to be far less than what these victims deserve. Their argument appears to be twofold. They argue that the settlement – about an average of $100,000 per plaintiff is fair.

It’s a difficult argument to present. But their second argument has more substance: the victims will no longer wait and want to get their money right now.

April 12 2023 Update: Many are wondering if J&J can file for bankruptcy once more. The answer is complicated and complex. However, let’s attempt to explain the issue in a simple way.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only way to deal with both present and future talc-related lawsuits definitively. In other words, it believes that it will be less expensive when there is a bankruptcy component that applies pressure for a settlement. Talc asbestos. Going back to more than 400 years in American history, the company argues that bankruptcy benefits everyone by dispersing settlements more equally and efficiently than trial courts, which are where litigants get significant payouts, while others are left with nothing.

The main thrust of this 3rd Circuit decision was this is not a matter of the profit-making company that has an affiliate to accept the legal responsibility and declare bankruptcy – Congress contemplated when drafting the Bankruptcy Code. However, it also stated that the entity was financially trouble because J&J promises unlimited funding.
Then J&J jumped on the unlimited funding portion of the contract and didn’t make any promises to fund unlimited cases. The company claims that its new financing agreements with its subsidiary will address concerns of the appeals court while offering claim payment funds. As if providing victims with lower amounts of money would resolve the underlying issue.

Attorneys representing cancer patients who oppose the agreement counter the agreement with what is countering legal nonsense with legal absurdity: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion of assets away from LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s decision. Hyperbole was not spared: victims’ lawyers call it the most significant “fraudulent transfer ever in United States history.”

Notwithstanding the legal mumbo jumbo, J&J does not really think that the bankruptcy will endure. However, it’s a means to push for this $8.9 billion settlement to keep pressure on plaintiffs.

April 10, 2023, Update Bloomberg provides an insightful report on a brand new law that has been passed in New Jersey that is shedding new light on litigation funding in the suit for class actions. Funders for litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson (J&J) concerning talc products in exchange for a share of any settlements. J&J is now offering that it will pay $8.9 billion to settle lawsuits.

The involvement of funders is publicly available due to a New Jersey court rule requiring the release of certain details about funders outside the state. The law is designed to address the growing calls for regulation of the litigation funders. J&J has to deal with more than 60,000 lawsuits when you add up state and federal Baby Powder lawsuits. Third-party financing in mass tort cases has its pros and pros and. However, there is no doubt that we are witnessing how third-party financing can help level the playing field between individuals and big companies in the courtroom.

April 4, 2023 Update: It is pleasing to see the worm turning in this lawsuit. J&J suffered another setback this week, when it was found that the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to keep the automatic stay in place while J&J appeals a bankruptcy decision in the U.S. Supreme Court. It has stopped the cases of talcum powder in a number of years and stopped any the filing of new lawsuits ever since J&J started the controversial process to spin talc-related liabilities off into a bankrupt company over one year back. Talc asbestos. When the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was insufficient only a few months back, the stay was revoked. J&J wanted to see it stayed in place until the SCOTUS appeal. But, no.
April 1, 2023 Update: Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. The odds that is that the Supreme Court is willing even to accept the appeal? Low.
March 16 2023 Update: With the bankruptcy stay having been fully lifted, the first new cases were filed and incorporated into the Talcum Powder class action MDL in over one year. Seven new talc-related lawsuits were brought into the MDL in the past month increasing the number of cases in the pending process up to 37,522.

February 25 2023 Update This morning, a Congressmen from Tennessee has now demanded that The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) launch an investigation to determine how much J&J product containing talc has cost the government over the decades.
Recently, in an open letter addressed to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) has accused J&J of failing to recognize the dangers of its talc product for many years, while tax dollars were spent on treating people who suffered injuries from exposure to the product. This lawsuit comes a few weeks after J&J’s major loss in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Talc asbestos. J&J must begin making reasonable settlement offers for victims in order getting this behind. This is a blemish on one of the top firms.

February 14 , 2023 Update: At an appearance today at the hearing in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention in light of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.