You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Talc asbestos cases. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

J&J’s proposed settlement with talc would provide the sum of $400 million US state AGs. Talc Asbestos Cases .

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has set aside $400 million to resolve U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of a wider $8.9 billion effort to settle allegations that it’s Baby Powder and other talc-based items cause cancer. Talc asbestos cases.

J&J subsidiaries LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday that outlines how the firm plans to pay different kinds of cancer patients in bankruptcy settlement. Talc asbestos cases. J&J has said that its Talc products are safe, and don’t cause cancer. J&J is seeking a second time to resolve more than 38,000 cases in bankruptcy and stop new cases from coming forward in the future.
LTL’s bankruptcy plan would pay $400 million into a separate trust for claims brought with state attorneys general alleging that J&J violated the state’s unfair commercial practices and consumer protection laws by misinforming consumers about the safety of its talc products.

Several states had begun consumer protection measures against J&J prior to LTL’s bankruptcy filing prevented these investigations from progressing in 2021. Talc asbestos cases. New Mexico and Mississippi had already brought suits with Johnson & Johnson before then as well as the states of Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued civil investigative demands or subpoenas according to court filings.

New Mexico and Mississippi have decided to declare LTL’s bankruptcy unfinished, joining cancer victims and their counterparts from the U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog. have argued that a profitable company like J&J is not eligible for bankruptcy protections intended for those struggling with debt.
The company’s initial attempt to resolve the bankruptcy cases was thrown out after similar arguments. A U.S. appellate court determined the LTL had not been in “financial distress” and ineligible under bankruptcy law. Talc asbestos cases. LTL declared bankruptcy a second time in just two hours following that dismissal, arguing that the second bankruptcy was different as it had less money available and more backing for the possibility of settling.

New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion to dismiss that LTL’s bankruptcy renewal violates state law enforcement authorities by seeking to unilaterally limit the liability of the company for state consumer protection measures.

Talc Asbestos Cases

LTL’s filings for the new year also contained more information about how the company would assess and pay claims for cancer should the bankruptcy plan be approved.

The largest amount of money under the settlement will be $500,000 to those diagnosed with terminal mesothelioma before age 45 and $260,000 for patients diagnosed with advanced ovarian cancer before age 45.

The proposed settlement provides discounts based on the nature and severity of cancer, the individual’s age, history of the use of talc, and other aspects. Talc asbestos cases. For example the case of a woman who used talc products on a weekly basis, who had the family history of ovarian cancer and was diagnosed with Stage II cancer of the ovary by age 55 may qualify to receive a payment of $21,125 under the plan.

Judge orders J&J, talc opponents to participate in settlement talks.

Following another round of hearings in Johnson and Johnson’s efforts to utilize a Texas Two-Step bankruptcy strategy to settle talc lawsuits, federal bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the company and those opposed to the plan to hold negotiations to settle the matter, Bloomberg reports.

With its second bankruptcy bid for LTL Management–a subsidiary established by J&J to manage the claims company offered a settlement amounting to $8.9 billion. Talc asbestos cases. While a group of law firms representing plaintiffs agree with the proposal, another group is against the settlement.

The previous week, the opposition group, known as the Official Committee of Talc Claimants and urging the bankruptcy court to dismiss this case by argument that LTL is not a factor financially distressed.

“The filing is a desperate and legally deficient attempt by a few of law firms to try to prevent claimants from voting on the resolution, which that the vast majority of claimants favor,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in a statement. Talc asbestos cases. “The law firms involved in this filing have financial interests that are in conflict with, contradict and are in opposition to the interests of their clients. We will be submitting an appeal before the court of appeals.”

Talc asbestos cases. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM that is home to more than mesothelioma clients who have filed lawsuits against J&J claimed that the company’s second bankruptcy try will fail.

“J&J publishes press release that boast about how amazing its plan is, while insisting that the plan’s details, including what individuals with illnesses would receive–be kept secret,” Thompson said in an announcement. “What do they have to cover up?”

Kaplan has instructed the sides to come up with another restructuring plan, with the oversight of two mediators.

In February 2022, Kaplan acknowledged J&J’s use of Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that would release the company from the thousands of lawsuits regarding its talcum products.

However, in January of this year a federal appeals court ruled against the decision, ruling that the firm could not be considered in “financial distress.”

The J&J’s plan to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court was dismissed at the end of April J&J was granted a second petition for bankruptcy just two hours later. In response to that move, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 days, allowing the company to decide whether to allow another bankruptcy.

J&J’s unstoppable profit machine sputters after $6.9B cost of litigation involving talc.

With 2 Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has been able to buy 19 months in which the cases were in limbo. Talc asbestos cases. The company is requesting that claimants take a vote to accept their settlement. J&J requires 75% approval for the deal to pass.

Alongside the group of talc lawyers that criticized the company’s bankruptcy in the U.S. Trustee, the U.S. Trustee which is a division belonging to the U.S. Department of Justice was also the one to file a motion to dismiss LTL’s second bankruptcy.

In a statement this week, U.S. trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the doors of bankruptcy are “open to honest, but naive debtors.” These doors “are not available to anyone that do not have a legitimate objective or seek to take advantage of the bankruptcy process to hinder or delay their creditors.” Vara continued.

For its part, J&J maintains there is no conclusive evidence that its Talc products, which includes its famous baby powder, can cause cancer. J&J has taken the products from the market and will first launch them on North America in 2020–and the remainder of the globe later this year.

J&J seeks to avoid the expense of going to court. It has won the majority of cases decided through trial, though certain losses have been punitive.
A highly-publicized trial in Missouri produced a $4.7 billion verdict against the drug maker and was later lowered to $2.1 billion following appeals.

Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
In all, J&J has lost nine cases involving talc, which are in appeal or concluded. In 41 trials 32 of them ended in the favor of J&J either through a mistrial or plaintiff verdict that was annulled upon appeal. Talc asbestos cases. Separately, the company in 2020 sought to settle nearly 1000 cases for the sum of $100 million. Bloomberg stated at the time.

Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Talc Asbestos Cases

Our lawyers handle baby powder lawsuits across every state. The lawsuits involving talcum powder in the case of Johnson & Johnson have been ongoing for many years. Talc asbestos cases. The lawsuits claim that the long-term use of the powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient in products like the Baby Powder and Shower to Shower as well as other products, may cause ovarian cancer in some women.

This page provides the J&J talc power litigation update and examines how the coming bankruptcy ruling affects the final settlement amounts in these Ovarian Cancer lawsuits.

Have you reached the deadline by which you to bring a talcum lawsuit? Many who believe the deadline has passed to file a lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Contact us now at 800-553-8082 or get a free and quick review of your case online.

Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Talc Asbestos Cases

June 2 2023 Update: During an asbestos talc court trial held which took place in California yesterday, technical issues interrupted the opening statements of the defense attorneys. Talc asbestos cases. Jurors who were watching from their homes via Zoom, did hear Johnson & Johnson’s lawyer expressing skepticism about the 70s science that claimed asbestos was present in their product, but the opening was abruptly ended.

In the meantime, the plaintiff was able to introduce their first witness, Arthur Langer. Langer explained that the existence of other minerals in talc is inevitable. He claimed that his group informed J&J in the year 1971 of the presence of asbestos chrysotile in the talc of the company, but in just 0.1 percent. He also uncovered more asbestos in 1976.

June 1st, 2023 Update: Talc asbestos cases. First trial after J&J made the decision to split its Talc division and declare bankruptcy is an important point within the ongoing lawsuit drama. Trial started on Monday in the harrowing case of a young 24-year-old plaintiff who was diagnosed with an aggressive and rare form of mesothelioma in the past year, a diagnosis lawyers on both sides agree is a harrowing tragedy.

Opening statements revealed the huge differences between the sides’ story. The attorney for the plaintiff took aim on Johnson & Johnson, alleging the use of deceitful techniques in its research practices and throughout the litigation process. The attorney claims that, according to Johnson & Johnson tried to alter asbestos’ definition, in spite of internal documents dating from the year 1978 and 1994 indicating that asbestos fibers found in tissue of the plaintiffs are included.

Johnson & Johnson’s uncertain $8.9 billion settlement deal hangs in the balance with the progress of this trial. Despite the unique nature of this mesothelioma lawsuit and its distinct issues compared to most talcum powder lawsuits A verdict in favor of the plaintiff could result in a serious setback to J&J’s expectations of widespread acceptance of their proposed settlement with plaintiffs.

May 31st, 2023: Update from Johnson & Johnson’s bankrupted talc unit has strongly defended the two-time Chapter 11 filing in the face of challenges from victims of talc injuries. In a written objection to the New Jersey bankruptcy court, the subsidiary argued that the filing differed fundamentally from the previous filing. The subsidiary emphasized the record-breaking commitment to $8.9 billion in settlement from J&J which is the biggest settlement ever to be made in any bankruptcy case that involves mass tort. Talc asbestos cases. It was not mentioned how the amount of the settlement implies that it is a fair settlement. J&J also claimed support from various plaintiffs’ law firms representing over 600,00 claimants. This is not easy to confirm but likely incorrect.

May 24 2023 Update: Following Johnson & Johnson’s bankruptcy in 2021 filing, the first trial involving its cosmetic talc items allegedly with asbestos content is scheduled to start jury selection Monday, May 24, California at Alameda County Superior Court, the most favored jurisdiction for plaintiffs. Plaintiff claims that mesothelioma resulted from asbestos exposure from J&J’s products, an allegation the company has denied. The trial also involves six retailers who are accused of selling talc-containing products.

May 22, 2023 Update: Lawyers in the 2nd J&J talc bankruptcy are now battling over who should be chosen to fill the role of future claims representative. This is which is vitally essential in resolving the Talc claims. Talc asbestos cases. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who regularly appears in MDLs throughout the country was appointed the claims representative in the first bankruptcy. J&J’s defense group wants Ellis to be appointed to that role and again, but attorneys for the plaintiffs in talc are arguing because Ellis has conflicts of interest that would prevent her from holding that position in the future. The dispute stems from issue that Ellis was reportedly involved in drafting the controversially litigated second bankruptcy, which raises concerns about her capability to remain neutral. In reality, the bankruptcy will be dismissed in the end.

May 17, 2023 Update The pretend company J&J formed to handle the bankruptcy of talc disclosed to a New Jersey bankruptcy court that they had allocated $400 million as a settlement for claims brought by states accusing the company of deceitful advertising for its talc products. Talc asbestos cases. This amounts to an $8.5 billion settlement for cancer patients. It is hard to imagine any scenario in which J&J can get these settlements for babies in these figures. While J&J’s proposed $8.5 billion offer might seem like a large sum at first, it does not look great after you calculate the figures. The settlement plan based on our rough calculations, would not provide victims with much more than a median settlement of $100,000 per instance. This isn’t enough.

May 15th, 2023 Update: J&J could be facing suit from an advocacy group representing cancer victims. Talc asbestos cases. The group claims J&J intentionally withdrew an $61.5 billion funding agreement in conjunction with its affiliate, LTL Management LLC, in order to create a false sense of financial distress and confirm the unit’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group claims this decision is a fraud transfer of the right to compensation for victims. They are planning to study J&J’s actions as a result of the dismissal of the first bankruptcy case of LTL.

May 10 2023 Update: The following week in this week the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments in a motion dismiss the second bankruptcy application from J&J LTL Management, J&J’s subsidiary. LTL Management. However, in the meantime it has approved an Order requiring both sides to participate in a second settlement mediation hoping that the global settlement can be brokered.

May 5th 2023: Update on Talc producer Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to numerous lawsuits alleging its talc products cause cancer due to asbestos exposure. Talc asbestos cases. Over 2,700 people have sued the firm and the company was paying $1 million per month on legal defense. The company’s recent $29million verdict on the state of South Carolina forced it to seek bankruptcy protection, arguing that assets should be distributed in an equitable manner between the claimants of talc instead of being taken through the receiver. Other suppliers of talc have been forced to file for bankruptcy as a result of litigation.

May 4 2023 Update: U.S. bankruptcy judge Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to resume talks on settlement with lawyers who turned down the proposed $8.9 billion offer for settlement. At Trenton, New Jersey yesterday, the parties appeared in court to discuss the next steps for the second bankruptcy case and Judge Kaplan has pushed for further settlement talks.

This is the way to settle these claims for J&J. A settlement for baby powder can get done. Talc asbestos cases. But it will require more money – billions of dollars coming from Johnson & Johnson.

Lawyers have a split opinion on whether to take the proposal or not and not every client sees the issue in the same manner their lawyer views it. A second bankruptcy proceeding is bound to go nowhere the judge Kaplan has scheduled a hearing in June to decide whether to dismiss the bankruptcy for the second time.

May 3, 2023 Update: A group of cancer victims who are suing Johnson & Johnson (J&J) requested to have they request that the Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it attempts to block litigation over talc products. The committee representing talc claimants has filed a motion this week requesting the Third Circuit to consider their case and send it back to a lower court with instructions to dismiss the bankruptcy. Talc asbestos cases. The committee also requested that the halted tort litigation against J&J should be permitted to proceed.
LTL applied for Chapter 11 protection once again following the bankruptcy filing it made earlier was denied in the Third Circuit earlier this year with the possibility of an $8.9 billion payment. The committee believes that the recent ruling allowing LTL’s 2nd Chapter 11 to continue, in addition to halting trials against J&J and J&J, requires an immediate Third Circuit review. The US Trustee also requested that the New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s global vice-president of litigation Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg declaring that J&J intends to file a formal response to the appeals court calling the request a “desperate and legally insufficient effort” by a small number of law firms who have conflicts of financial interests.
May 1st 2023 Update: A common question that people ask is how could plaintiffs and their lawyers turn around $8.9 billion. That’s of course an enormous amount of money. But there are plenty of victims. Talc asbestos cases. And these are really good claims for plaintiffs. We were reminded of this last week when two talc cases led to huge verdicts for the plaintiffs. In February the mesothelioma case involving talcum powder trial in Oregon resulted in an award of $18.1 million. The following month, a second mesothelioma trial involving talc was held for trials within South Carolina and resulted in the verdict of $29 million to the plaintiff. The defendant in both cases was Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc. one of the largest suppliers of talc within the U.S.
April 30th 2023 Update: When J&J first attempted to drag the litigation over talcum powder into bankruptcy, it came with the option of putting aside $2 billion to settle the case. This was an absurdly low amount. The talc plaintiffs had not believed in it. This time around, however, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 if the talc plaintiffs agree to a bankruptcy settlement and also has the support of a substantial portion of the talc plaintiffs and their attorneys. Talc asbestos cases. But 75% of the plaintiffs in the talc category, which is required for bankruptcy plan approval is not an easy task with so many lawyers with huge stocks of baby powder litigations opposed to the settlement.

What are the solutions to the impasse? More billions.
April 25, 2023 Update Talc cancer claimants have requested a judge to dismiss the Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a absurdly fabricated Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, saying the company is not financially troubled. LTL filed for Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby-powders caused cancer. Talc asbestos cases. The 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January and said that LTL was not a candidate for bankruptcy relief since it was unable to demonstrate financial difficulties.

The claimants contend that LTL’s Second Chapter 11 case is an fraud on the bankruptcy system, and that it’s being conducted in bad faith. J&J says the bankruptcy settlement has “significant backing” from firms representing an estimated 60,000 claimants. It’s safe to say that plaintiffs’ lawyers and victims are divided over the $8.9 billion offer for settlement.

April 21st, 2023 Update A bankruptcy judge has decided in favor of Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits alleging that the firm sold baby powder that was contaminated and causing cancer. While trials in Talc lawsuits are suspended for at least 60 days and new lawsuits are able to be filed and lawyers can begin preparing their cases. Talc asbestos cases. Judges expressed skepticism about J&J’s absurd attempt to revive its strategy with the second bankruptcy case.

April 13th 2023 Update: big story is that there’s an $8.9 billion over the course of 25 years of settlement. Lawyers representing cancer patients within the MDL group action pledged to challenge the settlement the talc claimants. Why? They feel it’s too little money for the 70,000 victims who have cancer. Talc asbestos cases. These lawyers argue that J&J should negotiate a larger settlement or pursue individual claims if the most recent bankruptcy is thrown out.

But there’s a separate set of lawyers who are not part of the leadership of the class action. These lawyers have amassed many thousands of cases. They want to settle with what they believe is far less than what these victims deserve. Their argument appears to be two-fold. First, they argue the settlement of around the equivalent of $100,000 per plaintiff – is fair.

It’s a difficult argument to argue. But their second argument has more force: victims should now not wait and they want their money now.

April 12, 2023 Update: People are looking for ways J&J can go through bankruptcy once more. The answer is complicated and complex. However, let’s attempt to explain it clearly.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only option to resolve both current and future lawsuits involving talc conclusively. That is, it believes it can pay less when there is an element of bankruptcy that puts pressure for a settlement. Talc asbestos cases. Moving past more than 400 years in American history, the firm claims that bankruptcy benefits everyone by dispersing settlement payments more evenly and effectively than trial courts where some litigants receive significant settlements while others get nothing.

The basic tenet in the 3rd Circuit decision was this is not a case – one that makes a profit, but a subsidiary to take the legal responsibility and declare bankruptcy Congress had in mind when it came to drafting the Bankruptcy Code. However, the court also ruled that the entity was financially trouble because J&J offered unlimited financing.
So J&J decided to go with the unlimited funding portion of the agreement and didn’t promise that it would provide unlimited funds for litigation. J&J claims that its new financing agreements with its subsidiary address the concerns of the appeals court while offering funds to pay claims. In the hope that offering victims lesser money could solve the underlying issue.

Lawyers representing cancer patients who do not agree with the agreement counter this argument by saying that it is countering legal nonsense with legal nonsense: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion of assets away from LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s previous ruling. Hyperbole is not exempt attorneys representing the victims claim it the largest “fraudulent transaction in United States history.”

Despite the legal jargon, J&J does not really believe that this bankruptcy will last. But it is a way to push for this $8.9 billion settlement through and maintain pressure on plaintiffs.

April 10, 2023 Update: Bloomberg has an interesting article about a new law that has been passed in New Jersey that is shedding new light on the funding of litigation in the baby powder plaintiffs in the class action. Funders for litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of claims that were brought against Johnson & Johnson (J&J) concerning talc products in exchange in exchange for a portion of profits. J&J is now offering that it will pay $8.9 billion to settle any lawsuits.

The involvement of the funders is public information due to the New Jersey court rule requiring the disclosure of certain information about funding sources outside of the. The rules aim to address the growing calls for regulation of litigation funders. J&J faces over 60,000 claims when you include state and federal infant powder litigation. Third-party funding of mass tort cases has both pros and cons. There is no doubt that we are seeing how third-party financing can help level the playing field for individuals as well as large corporations in court.

April 4 2023 Update: It is interesting to watch the worm turn in this case. J&J suffered another setback this week, when it was found that the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to maintain the automatic stay in the meantime that J&J appeals a bankruptcy ruling before the U.S. Supreme Court. Automatic stays have frozen thousands of talcum cases and prevented the filing of new lawsuits ever since J&J began the controversial plan to spin the talc debts off into a bankrupt entity over one year earlier. Talc asbestos cases. After the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was insufficient just a few months ago the stay was removed. J&J had hoped to have it continue in the meantime of hearing the SCOTUS appeal. However, the answer was no.
April 1, 2023 Update: Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. The likelihood that is that the Supreme Court is willing even to consider the appeal? Low.
March 16 2023 Update: With the bankruptcy stay having been in effect, the first new cases were filed and incorporated into the class action involving talcum powder MDL in the space of a year. Seven new talc cases were joined to the MDL over the last month increasing the number of pending cases up to 37,522.

February 25 2023 Update 2023 Update: A Congressmen from Tennessee is now calling for The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) start an investigation into the cost J&J Talc products have cost the government over the decades.
A recent email addressed to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) in a recent letter to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten. J&J of failing to recognize the dangers of its talc products for years while tax dollars were spent on treating people who suffered injuries from exposure to the chemicals. The lawsuit comes just a few weeks after J&J’s significant loss in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Talc asbestos cases. J&J should begin to make reasonable settlement proposals for victims in order the process of putting all this behind it. This is a disgrace to one of the most prestigious companies.

February 14 2023 Update: At the hearing held today at the hearing in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention in light of the third U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.