You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Talc does not cause cancer. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!
J&J’s proposed talc settlement would provide the sum of $400 million US state AGs. Talc Does Not Cause Cancer .
Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has set aside $400 million to address U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of its wider $8.9 billion settlement of allegations that its Baby Powder and other talc ingredients cause cancer. Talc does not cause cancer.
J&J company subsidiary LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday which outlines how the company intends to pay for different types of cancer victims as part of the bankruptcy settlement. Talc does not cause cancer. J&J has claimed that its talc products are safe and will not cause cancer. It’s trying for the second time to end more than 38,000 lawsuits brought in bankruptcy, and to prevent any new cases from being filed in the future.
LTL’s bankruptcy plan would pay $400 million into a separate trust for claims made by state attorneys general claiming that J&J had violated state unfair business practices as well as consumer protection laws, by deceiving consumers about the safety of its talc products.
Many states had initiated consumer protection lawsuits against J&J prior to the first bankruptcy filing prevented those investigations from proceeding in 2021. Talc does not cause cancer. New Mexico and Mississippi had already filed suit against Johnson & Johnson before then as well as the states of Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued civil investigative demands or subpoenas, according to LTL’s court filings.
New Mexico and Mississippi have taken steps to halt the bankruptcy of LTL, joining cancer victims as well as those affected by cancer and the U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog. argue that a profit-making company like J&J does not qualify for bankruptcy protections designed for the struggling debtors.
LTL’s first attempt at resolving the bankruptcy lawsuits was dismissed following similar arguments, when a U.S. appellate court ruled the LTL was not in “financial trouble” and thus not eligible of bankruptcy protection. Talc does not cause cancer. LTL declared bankruptcy a second time just over two hours after that dismissal, arguing that the second bankruptcy was different as it had less money and more backing for the possibility of settling.
New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion for dismissal that LTL’s latest bankruptcy violation of the state’s law enforcement authority by trying to unilaterally cap the company’s liability for state consumer protection laws.
Talc Does Not Cause Cancer
The filings of LTL’s latest bankruptcy proceedings also include more information about how the company plans to evaluate and settle cancer claims when the bankruptcy plan is approved.
The largest amount of money under the settlement would be $500,000 to those diagnosed with mesothelioma that is terminal before the age of 45, and $260,000 for those diagnosed with ovarian cancer that is terminal prior to age 45.
From there, the proposed settlement offers discounts based on the kind and severity of the cancer, the person’s years of age, their history of usage of talc and other variables. Talc does not cause cancer. For example, a woman who used talc products weekly, had the family history of ovarian cancer and was diagnosed the stage 2 ovarian cancer when she was 55 could be in line to receive a payout of $21,125 under the plan.
Judge ordains J&J, talc opponents to engage in settlement talks.
After another round of hearings in Johnson & Johnson’s attempt to use a Texas Two-Step bankruptcy strategy to resolve talc litigation and federal bankruptcy judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the company and those opposing the plan to enter into negotiations to settle the matter, Bloomberg reports.
The second time it attempted to file for bankruptcy for LTL Management, a subsidiary created by J&J to settle claims – the company offered a settlement amounting to $8.9 billion. Talc does not cause cancer. While one firm representing plaintiffs support the offer, another group opposes the deal.
In the last week, an opposition group, dubbed”the Official Committee of Talc Claimants, urged the bankruptcy court to dismiss the case by saying that LTL can not be considered financially distressed.
“The filing is a desperate and legally ineffective attempt by a handful of law firms to try to prevent claimants from voting on the resolution plan, a plan that the vast majority of claimants approve of,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in a statement. Talc does not cause cancer. “The law firms who filed the filing are pursuing financial interests which conflict with, contradict and contravene those of their clients. We’ll submit an appeal an appeal to the appellate court.”
Talc does not cause cancer. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM who has more than 80 mesothelioma patients who have filed lawsuits against J&J for bankruptcy, told J&J’s second bankruptcy effort is likely to fail.
“J&J issue press releases describing how fantastic the plan is but simultaneously insisting that the plan’s details, including what individual sick people would actually receive — be kept private,” Thompson said in a statement. “What is J&J’s plan to cover up?”
Kaplan has instructed the sides to create a reorganization plan, under supervision and supervision of mediators.
The court in February of 2022 Kaplan affirmed the ability of J&J’s recourse to Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that would release the company from the hundreds of thousands of claims related to its talcum-based products.
In January of this year, a federal appeals court ruled against the decision, ruling that the firm could not be considered in “financial distress.”
After J&J’s challenge the U.S. Supreme Court was denied in April, J&J filed for its second bankruptcy two hours after. In response to that move, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 days in order to determine whether to grant another bankruptcy.
J&J’s unstoppable profit engine goes out of control after $6.9B the talc litigation cost.
In the Two Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has gotten 19 months of which cases were placed suspended. Talc does not cause cancer. J&J wants the claimants to decide whether they want to accept the settlement. J&J needs 75% of the vote for the settlement to be approved.
In addition to the gang of talc lawyers who criticised the company’s bankruptcy and the U.S. Trustee which is a division belonging to the U.S. Department of Justice, also filed an appeal to dismiss LTL’s bankruptcy second case.
In a statement this week, U.S. trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the bankruptcy courts are “open to honest but unfortunate debtors.” The doors “are not open to any parties that lack a legitimate bankruptcy reason or want to abuse the bankruptcy process to delay or hinder their creditors,” Vara continued.
In its own words, J&J maintains there is no definitive evidence to suggest that its products containing talc, such as its famous baby powder, can cause cancer. J&J has adopted the products of the market, first in North America in 2020–and the remainder of the globe later this year.
J&J seeks to avoid the expense of going to court. It has won the majority of the cases that have been decided at trial, but some losses have been severe.
A high-profile trial in Missouri led to an $4.7 billion verdict against the drug maker that was later reduced to $2.1 billion after appeals.
Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
Overall, J&J has lost nine trial cases in talc which are being appealed or settled. Of the 41 trials, 32 of them ended in the favor of J&J either through a mistrial or plaintiff verdicts that were annulled after appeal. Talc does not cause cancer. In addition, J&J in 2020 moved to settle more than 1,000 cases for $110 million. Bloomberg published at the time.
Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Talc Does Not Cause Cancer
Our lawyers handle baby powder lawsuits in every state. The talcum powder lawsuits on behalf of Johnson & Johnson have been in the process for several years. Talc does not cause cancer. The lawsuits claim that the long-term use of talcum powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient in products like Baby Powder as well as Shower to Shower as well as other products, may cause ovarian cancer among some women.
This page offers the J&J Talc Power Update and provides an overview of how the upcoming bankruptcy ruling affects the final settlement amount in the ovarian cancer lawsuits.
Is the deadline for you to bring a talcum lawsuit? Many who believe that the statute of limitations has passed to sue Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Call us today at 800-553-8082 or request a free and quick case review online.
Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Talc Does Not Cause Cancer
June 2 2023 Update: At the asbestos talc case in California yesterday, a couple of technical glitches interrupted the opening statement by the defense lawyers. Talc does not cause cancer. Jurors from home on Zoom, did hear Johnson & Johnson’s lawyer voice his skepticism about the 70s science affirming the presence of asbestos in their product prior to the trial was abruptly closed.
Meanwhile, the plaintiff could present its first expert witness Arthur Langer. Langer said that the presence of other minerals with talc is inevitable. He testified that his team informed J&J in 1971 about the presence of chrysotile asbestos within the talc manufactured by the company, though in lesser than 0.1 percent. He also found more asbestos in 1976.
June 1, 2023 Update: Talc does not cause cancer. First trial after J&J decided to spin off its talc section and declaring bankruptcy marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing talc litigation drama. The trial started yesterday in the poignant case of a young 24 year-old plaintiff, diagnosed with an aggressive and rare form of mesothelioma last year. which lawyers on both sides of the argument agree is a tragic loss.
The opening statements exposed the huge differences between the sides’ narrative. The plaintiff’s attorney took aim at Johnson & Johnson, alleging that the company employed deceitful techniques in its research practices and throughout the litigation process. In the words of attorney the company tried to manipulate the definition of asbestos despite internal documents from 1978 and 1994 showing that asbestos fibers in the tissue of the plaintiff are included.
Johnson & Johnson’s precarious $8.9 billion settlement is hanging in the balance with the progress of this trial. Despite the unique nature of this mesothelioma lawsuit and its distinctive issues in comparison to other talcum powder lawsuits ruling in favor of the plaintiff could result in the company with a major setback in its expectations of widespread acceptance of their proposed settlement among plaintiffs.
May 31st 2023 Update: Johnson & Johnson’s bankrupted talc unit has was able to defend it’s two-time Chapter 11 filing in the face of challenges from injured talc claimants. In an opposition filed with the New Jersey bankruptcy court, it argued that the situation was fundamentally different from the first filing. The subsidiary emphasized the record-breaking commitment to $8.9 billion to J&J the largest settlement ever in an bankruptcy case involving mass torts. Talc does not cause cancer. It was not mentioned how the magnitude of the settlement indicates that it is a fair settlement. J&J also claimed support from a variety of plaintiffs’ law firms that represent over the 60,000 plaintiffs. It is difficult to confirm but likely incorrect.
May 24 2023 Update: As of Johnson and Johnson’s bankruptcy filing in 2021 filing, the very first trial involving its cosmetic talc products that are believed to that contain asbestos is scheduled to start jury selection Monday in California with Alameda County Superior Court, a historically good court for plaintiffs. The plaintiff claims his mesothelioma is the result of asbestos exposure through J&J’s products and the company denies. The trial also involves six retailers accused of selling talc-containing products.
May 22nd, 2023 Update Lawyers in the 2nd J&J talc bankruptcy are in a dispute over who should be appointed to the role of the future claims representative, a role that is critically critical to resolving Talc claims. Talc does not cause cancer. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who frequently appears in MDLs throughout the United States, was appointed as the claims representative in the first bankruptcy. J&J’s defense team would like Ellis to be named to the position in the future, however lawyers representing the talc plaintiffs are protesting on the grounds that Ellis has an interest conflict that should prevent her from being appointed to that post for the second time. The issue stems from the reality that Ellis was apparently involved in the creation of the hotly contested second bankruptcy, which raises concerns regarding her capacity to remain neutral. The reality is this bankruptcy could be dismissed regardless.
May 17, 2023 Update The pretend company J&J made up to handle the bankruptcy of talc has informed a New Jersey bankruptcy court that they have designated $400 million to pay the claims made by states accusing J&J of misleading marketing regarding its talc products. Talc does not cause cancer. It’s a $8.5 billion settlement for cancer victims. It’s difficult to imagine any scenario in which J&J will be able to push the settlements of baby powder through with these numbers. While J&J’s proposed $8.5 billion offer may seem like a large sum at first, it does not look good when you look at the numbers. This settlement offer based on our rough calculations – would not pay victims much more than an average settlement $100,000 per case. That is not enough.
May 15th 2023, Update J&J could be facing lawsuit brought by an advocacy group that represents cancer patients. Talc does not cause cancer. The group claims J&J deliberately withdrew the $61.5 billion contract for funding that it had with its company subsidiary LTL Management LLC, to create the appearance of financial hardship and to validate the company’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group claims that this move is equivalent to a fraudulent transfer of right to compensation for victims. They plan to explore J&J’s actions following of the dismissal of LTL’s first bankruptcy suit.
May 10 2023 Update: The following week, it is expected that the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments on a motion to dismiss the second bankruptcy filing that was filed by J&J company LTL Management. In the meantime, it has approved an Order requiring both sides to participate in a settlement mediation hoping that it will be possible to reach a global settlement agreement been reached.
May 5 2023: Update on Talc producer Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to many lawsuits claiming that its talc products cause cancer from asbestos exposure. Talc does not cause cancer. Over 2,700 individuals have sued the firm, and it was paying $1 million per month for legal defense. The company’s recent $29million verdict in South Carolina forced it to pursue bankruptcy protection, and arguing for a fair distribution of assets between talc claimants rather than being taken over in the hands of the receiver. Other suppliers of talc have been forced to file for bankruptcy as a result of litigation.
May 4 2023, Update U.S. The bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to restart negotiations with lawyers who turned down the proposed $8.9 billion settlement offer. At Trenton, New Jersey yesterday the parties gathered in court to discuss the next steps in another bankruptcy proceeding and Judge Kaplan has pushed for further settlement talks.
This is the best way to resolve these claims for J&J. The baby powder settlement is likely to get done. Talc does not cause cancer. But it will require more money, more billions of dollars – of Johnson & Johnson.
Lawyers are split on whether or not to agree with the proposal and not all clients view this issue the same way their attorney does. This second case of bankruptcy is likely to fail, the judge Kaplan has scheduled a hearing for June to determine if she will discharge the bankruptcy for the 2nd time.
May 3 2023 Update: A group representing cancer victims suing Johnson & Johnson (J&J) demanded for they request that the Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it is an attempt to halt the litigation involving talc products. The committee representing talc claimants has filed a motion this week, asking the Third Circuit to consider their case and to send it back the lower court, with instructions for dismissing the bankruptcy. Talc does not cause cancer. The committee also requested that the stoppage of tort litigation against J&J continue to continue.
LTL applied for Chapter 11 protection once again following its bankruptcy filing that was denied by the Third Circuit earlier this year with a $8.9 billion settlement. The committee argues that the recent decision allowing LTL’s 2nd Chapter 11 to continue, in addition to halting trials against J&J should be subject to immediate Third Circuit review. The US Trustee also asked that the New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s worldwide vice president of litigation, Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg declaring that J&J intends to file a reply to the appeals court declaring the filing a “desperate and legally deficient attempt” by a few of law firms that have conflicts of financial interests.
May 1st 2023 Update: One frequently asked question is how plaintiffs and their lawyers be able to turn off $8.9 billion. Of course, it’s a lot of money. But there are a lot of victims. Talc does not cause cancer. These are actually a good cases for plaintiffs. We have been reminded of this recently with two talc trials resulted in big verdicts for plaintiffs. In February, a talcum powder mesothelioma trial in Oregon ended in the verdict worth $18.1 million. The following month, a second mesothelioma talc case was brought to hearing within South Carolina and resulted in a verdict of $29million for the plaintiff. In both instances, the defendant was Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc. One of the most prominent suppliers of talc in the U.S.
April 30 2023 Update: J&J first tried to bring the talcum powder lawsuit into bankruptcy, it did so with an offer to reserve $2 billion for settlements. This was an absurdly low amount. There was no one among the talc victims who believed in the offer. This time around, however, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 if the talc plaintiffs agree to a bankruptcy settlement and they also have the support of a substantial part of the talc-related plaintiffs and their attorneys. Talc does not cause cancer. But with 75% of plaintiffs of talc are required to approve bankruptcy plans, it a tough road since there are so many lawyers with huge inventories of baby powder lawsuits that are opposed against the proposed settlement.
What is the solution to this impasse? More billions.
April 25 2023 Update Talc cancer claimants have requested a judge to dismiss their Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a absurdly fabricated Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, insisting that the company is not financially strained. LTL filed for Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby-powders caused cancer. Talc does not cause cancer. LTL was denied Chapter 11 in January. 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January The court ruled that LTL was not a candidate for bankruptcy relief because it had not demonstrated financial difficulties.
The plaintiffs argue that LTL’s second Chapter 11 case is an abuse of the bankruptcy system and that it’s being conducted in bad good faith. J&J states that the bankruptcy settlement has “significant backing” from firms representing around 60,000 plaintiffs. It’s fair to say that the plaintiffs’ attorneys and victims ‘ lawyers are divided on this $8.9 billion offer for settlement.
April 21st, 2023 Update A bankruptcy judge has ruled the company Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits alleging that the firm sold tainted baby powder causing cancer. Although the trials for the lawsuits involving talc are delayed for a minimum of 60 days but new lawsuits can be filed, and lawyers will begin preparing their cases. Talc does not cause cancer. Judges expressed skepticism about J&J’s pathetic attempt to revive its strategy with another bankruptcy case.
April 13th, 2023 Update: major update is about the $8.9 billion over the next 25 years offer for settlement. Lawyers representing cancer patients in MDL class action MDL Class Action have promised to challenge the settlement talc claimants. Why? They think it is not enough for 70 000 cancer patients. Talc does not cause cancer. These lawyers believe that J&J should negotiate a larger settlement or settle individual claims if the latest bankruptcy is declared unconstitutional.
However, there is a second group of lawyers outside of the leadership of this class action. They have amassed tens of thousands of cases. The group is seeking to settle today for what is believed to be less than these victims deserve. Their argument appears to be twofold. First, they argue the settlement, which is about 100,000 dollars per plaintiff is fair.
It’s a difficult argument to prove. However, their second argument has more force: the victims can be no longer patient and demand to get their money right now.
April 12 2023 Update: Many are wondering if J&J could file for bankruptcy again. The answer is complicated and confusing. Let’s try to clarify it simply.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only means to settle both present and future talc-related lawsuits definitively. That is, it believes it can pay less if there is a bankruptcy component that applies pressure to negotiate a settlement. Talc does not cause cancer. Moving past 400 years of American past, the company believes that bankruptcy is beneficial to everyone by dispersing settlement payments more equitably and efficiently than trial courts, where litigants are awarded significant settlements while others get nothing.
The gist in this 3rd Circuit decision was this is not a matter of the profit-making company that has an affiliate to accept the legal burden and declare bankruptcy – Congress contemplated when drafting the Bankruptcy Code. However, it also stated that the subsidiary was not in financial crisis because J&J promises unlimited funding.
This is why J&J took advantage of the unlimited funding portion of the contract and did not promise to offer unlimited funding for the litigation. The company says that its updated financing arrangements with its subsidiary will address concerns of the appellate court, while supplying funds for claim payments. As if providing victims with less money would solve the problem at hand.
Lawyers representing cancer patients who are against the agreement argue the agreement with what is a defense against legal nonsense by pointing out legal absurdity: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion of assets away from LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s previous ruling. Hyperbole was not spared attorneys representing the victims claim it the most significant “fraudulent deal that has occurred in United States history.”
Notwithstanding the legal mumbo jumbo, J&J does not really think this bankruptcy will survive. But it is a way of pushing this $8.9 billion settlement to keep the pressure on plaintiffs.
April 10 2023 update: Bloomberg has an interesting article about a new law of New Jersey that is shedding new light on litigation funding in the suit for class actions. Funders for litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of claims that were brought against Johnson & Johnson (J&J) on behalf of talc products. They exchanged for a percentage of any profits. J&J has now offered an offer of $8.9 billion in settlements for all lawsuits.
The funders’ involvement is public information due to a New Jersey court rule requiring the release of certain details about outside funding backers. This rule is intended to address the growing calls for the regulation of litigation funders. J&J has more than 60,000 claims when you include state and federal infant powder litigation. Third-party financing in mass tort cases has both pros and pros and. There is no doubt that we are seeing how third-party funding could level the playing field for individuals and big corporations in court.
April 4, 2023 Update: It’s enjoyable to see the worm turning in this litigation. J&J took another hit this week when it was found that the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to continue the automatic stay in the meantime that J&J appeals an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. This automatic stay stopped thousands of talcum cases and stopped the filing of new lawsuits ever since J&J started the controversial process to spin the talc liabilities into a bankrupt company over one year earlier. Talc does not cause cancer. When it was decided that the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was insufficient only a few months back, the stay was revoked. J&J wanted to see it remain in effect until an appeal to the SCOTUS appeal. However, the answer was no.
April 1st, 2023 Update: Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. The chance the Supreme Court is willing even to accept the appeal? Low.
March 16 2023 Update: With the bankruptcy stay having been fully lifted, the first new cases have been filed and transferred into the talcum powder class action MDL in just over a year. Seven new talc-related lawsuits were included in the MDL in the past month increasing the number of cases that are pending to 37,522.
February 25 2023 Update 2023 Update: A Congressmen from Tennessee is now requesting that the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) start an investigation into the cost J&J Talc products have cost the government over the decades.
in a letter to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) claimed that J&J of ignoring the dangers of its talc-based products for long while tax dollars used to treat those who were injured through exposure to the product. The demand comes just weeks after J&J’s significant loss in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.
Talc does not cause cancer. J&J has to begin making reasonable settlements for victims in order to put all of this behind it. This is a disgrace to one of the greatest businesses.
February 14 2023 Update: In an earlier hearing in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention following his 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.
You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Talc does not cause cancer. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!