You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Talc settlements. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

J&J’s proposed talc settlement would be worth the sum of $400 million US state AGs. Talc Settlements .

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has put aside $400 million to settle U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of a broad $8.9 billion effort to settle allegations that it’s Baby Powder and other talc-based product causes cancer. Talc settlements.

J&J company subsidiary LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday that outlines how the firm will pay various types of cancer sufferers in a bankruptcy settlement. Talc settlements. J&J has declared that its Talc products are safe, and do not cause cancer. The company is trying for another time to settle more than 38,000 cases in bankruptcy and prevent new cases from arising in the near future.
LTL’s bankruptcy plan would pay $400 million into a separate trust for claims brought by state attorneys general claiming that J&J was in violation of states’ unfair practices and consumer protection laws through misleading consumers about the dangers of its talc products.

Some states had started consumer protection actions against J&J prior to LTL’s bankruptcy filing prevented those investigations from proceeding in 2021. Talc settlements. New Mexico and Mississippi had already filed actions for damages against Johnson & Johnson before then and the states of Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued civil investigative subpoenas or demands according to court papers.

New Mexico and Mississippi have moved to dismiss LTL’s bankruptcy along with cancer sufferers as well as their counterparts from the U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog. have claimed that a lucrative firm like J&J does not qualify for bankruptcy protections intended for the struggling debtors.
The first time LTL attempted to settle the bankruptcy cases was dismissed following similar arguments. The U.S. appellate court ruled it was not LTL was not in “financial difficulty” and ineligible of bankruptcy protection. Talc settlements. LTL had filed for bankruptcy again just over two hours after the decision to dismiss, arguing that its second attempt was different because it had less money available and more support for the settlement.

New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion for dismissal that LTL’s renewed bankruptcy violates state law enforcement authorities by trying to unilaterally cap LTL’s liability to state consumer protection laws.

Talc Settlements

The filings of LTL’s latest bankruptcy proceedings also include more information about how the company would evaluate and pay cancer claims should the bankruptcy plan be approved.

The highest payments under the settlement would be $500,000 to those diagnosed with cancer of the mesothelioma ovary before age 45 and $260,000 for patients diagnosed with cancer of the ovary before age 45.

From there, the proposed settlement will offer discounts based on the kind and severity of the cancer, the person’s age, history of usage of talc and other variables. Talc settlements. For instance, a woman who used talc products on a weekly basis, who had the family history of ovarian cancer, and was diagnosed with an ovarian cancer stage II when she was 55 might qualify for a $21,125 payout under the program.

Judge gives order to J&J and talc opponents engage in settlement talks.

Following another round of hearings in Johnson & Johnson’s effort to utilize a Texas Two-Step bankruptcy strategy for talc litigation and federal bankruptcy judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the firm and the people who opposed the plan to hold talks to reach a settlement, Bloomberg reports.

In its second bankruptcy effort for LTL Management, a subsidiary created by J&J to manage the claims company offered a settlement amounting to $8.9 billion. Talc settlements. While a group of law firms representing plaintiffs support the deal, another group opposes the deal.

In the last week, an opposition group, which is known as”The Official Committee of Talc Claimants requested the bankruptcy court to dismiss the case asserting that LTL cannot be regarded as financially distressed.

“The filing is an unjust and legally flawed attempt by a tiny number of law firms to stop claimants from voting on the resolution plan – a plan that the vast majority of claimants approve of,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in a statement. Talc settlements. “The law firms who filed this filing have financial interests that conflict with, differ from and are in opposition to the interests of their clients. We’ll soon submit a response in the appeals court.”

Talc settlements. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM that includes more than mesothelioma victims who have filed lawsuits against J&J claimed that J&J’s second bankruptcy attempt will fail.

“J&J issues press releases describing how fantastic its plans are, but is demanding that plan details–including what each sick person will receive — be kept private,” Thompson said in an announcement. “What does the company have to cover up?”

Blog Talc JPML

Kaplan has instructed both sides to devise a second reorganization plan, under the oversight from two mediators.

The court in February of 2022 Kaplan stated that J&J’s recourse to Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that would relieve the company from the thousands of lawsuits regarding its talcum products.

However, in January of this year an appeals court of the federal government overturned the verdict, ruling that the firm could not be considered in “financial trouble.”

In the event that J&J’s request to make an appeal before the U.S. Supreme Court was dismissed on April 1, J&J declared bankruptcy about two hours after. In response, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 days, allowing the company to decide whether or not to accept to file for bankruptcy again.

J&J’s unstoppable profit engine sputters after $6.9B cost of litigation involving talc.

In the two Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has gotten 19 months of which cases were placed in limbo. Talc settlements. The company wants claimants to vote on accepting their settlement. J&J would need 75% support for the deal to go through.

Alongside the group of talc attorneys who have panned the company’s bankruptcy and the U.S. Trustee, a branch that is part of the U.S. Department of Justice is also submitting a motion to dismiss LTL’s second bankruptcy case.

In a letter filed this week, U.S. trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the bankruptcy courts are “open to honest but unfortunate debtors.” These doors “are not accessible to those that do not have a legitimate reason or want to take advantage of the bankruptcy process to hinder or delay their creditors,” Vara continued.

In its own words, J&J maintains there is no evidence conclusive that its Talc-based products, such as its famous baby powder, cause cancer. J&J has taken the products from the market and will first launch them on North America in 2020–and the rest of the world this year.

J&J intends to steer clear of the expense of going to court. It has prevailed in the majority of cases that were decided at trial, but certain losses have been punitive.
A highly publicized trial in Missouri resulted in a $4.7 billion verdict against the drug maker, which was later reduced to $2.1 billion after appeals.

Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
In all, J&J has lost nine trial cases in talc which are on appeal or have been concluded. Out of 41 trials, 32 ended with the favor of J&J or a mistrial, or plaintiff verdict that was overturned in appeal. Talc settlements. The company also in 2020 moved to settle over 1000 cases for the sum of $100 million. Bloomberg stated at the time.

Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Talc Settlements

Our lawyers are handling baby powder lawsuits in all 50 states. The talcum powder lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson have been going on for a long time. Talc settlements. The lawsuits contend that the prolonged use of the powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient in many products, including Baby Powder as well as Shower to Shower which can cause ovarian cancer in some women.

This page gives an J&J Talc Power Update and explains how the forthcoming bankruptcy ruling affects the final settlement amounts in the ovarian cancer lawsuits.

Has the deadline passed for you to file a talcum powder lawsuit? Many who assume the statute of limitations has passed to sue Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Call us today at 800-553-8082 or request a free and quick case review online.

Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Talc Settlements

June 2 2023 Update: In the asbestos talc trial at the trial in California yesterday, a few technical glitches interrupted the opening statements made by defense lawyers. Talc settlements. Jurors from home via Zoom, did hear Johnson and Johnson’s lawyer express doubt about the science of the 70s that claimed asbestos was present in their product before the proceedings abruptly ended.

The plaintiff could present their first witness, Arthur Langer. Langer said that the presence of other minerals alongside talc is inevitable. He claimed that his group had notified J&J in the year 1971 of the presence of chrysotile asbestos within the talc of the company, but in just 0.1 percent. He also discovered more asbestos in 1976.

June 1st, 2023 Update Talc settlements. The first trial since J&J decided to spin off its talc division and declare bankruptcy is an important point of the ongoing litigation drama. The trial started yesterday in the heartbreaking case of a young 24 year-old plaintiff who was diagnosed with a rare and aggressive type of mesothelioma earlier this year. an illness that lawyers on both sides agree is a harrowing tragedy.

Opening statements revealed stark differences in each side’s story. The attorney for the plaintiff took aim on Johnson & Johnson, alleging that the company employed deceitful tactics in research practices and throughout the litigation procedure. The attorney claims that, according to, the company attempted to manipulate asbestos’ definition, despite internal documents from between 1978 and 1994 that showed asbestos fibers that were found in the tissues of the plaintiff are part of.

Johnson & Johnson’s uncertain $8.9 billion settlement offer hangs in the balance with the course of this trial. Despite the unique nature of the mesothelioma trial and its unique challenges compared to the majority of talcum powder lawsuits, a verdict favoring the plaintiff could be the company with a major setback in its hope of gaining broad acceptance for their proposed settlement with plaintiffs.

May 31st 2023 Update: Johnson & Johnson’s bankrupt talc division strongly defended their Second Chapter 11 filing in the face of challenges from the talc injury plaintiffs. In an opposition filed with the New Jersey bankruptcy court, it argued that the case was distinct from the earlier filing. It also emphasized the unprecedented commitment of $8.9 billion in settlement from J&J which is the largest ever settlement in an bankruptcy case involving mass torts. Talc settlements. Not mentioned: how the amount of the settlement implies that it is a fair settlement. J&J also claimed that it received support from various plaintiffs’ law companies representing over sixty thousand claimants. This is hard to verify but it’s likely to be false.

May 24 2023 Update: As of Johnson and Johnson’s bankruptcy filing in 2021 filing, the very first trial regarding its cosmetic talc products allegedly that contain asbestos is scheduled to start jury selection on Monday, May 24, California with Alameda County Superior Court, a historically good court for plaintiffs. The plaintiff claims his mesothelioma resulted from asbestos exposure from J&J’s products and the company is denying. The trial also includes six retailers accused of selling talc-containing products.

May 22, 2023 Update: Lawyers involved in the 2nd J&J talc bankruptcy are now in a dispute over who should be appointed to the role of future claims representative. This is which is vitally critical to resolving Talc claims. Talc settlements. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who regularly appears in MDLs throughout the United States, was appointed as the claims representative during the first bankruptcy. J&J’s defense attorneys want Ellis to be appointed to this position yet again, but the lawyers for the talc plaintiffs have raised objections because Ellis has conflicts of interest which would prohibit her from being appointed to that post in the future. The dispute stems from possibility that Ellis was apparently involved in drafting the controversially contested second bankruptcy, which raises doubts about her ability to be neutral. The reality is this bankruptcy could be dismissed in the end.

May 17, 2023 Update: The pretend company that J&J created for the talc bankruptcy told an New Jersey bankruptcy court that they have designated $400 million to settle the claims brought by states accusing J&J of misleading marketing for its talc products. Talc settlements. It’s a $8.5 billion settlement for cancer sufferers. It is hard to imagine any scenario in which J&J can push the baby powder settlements in these figures. While J&J’s proposed $8.5 billion offer might seem like a huge sum initially, it may not look great after you calculate the figures. The settlement plan based on our rough calculations, would not be able to pay victims more than $100,000 per instance. This isn’t enough.

May 15, 2023 Update: J&J could be facing lawsuit brought by an advocacy group representing cancer victims. Talc settlements. The group argues that J&J deliberately retracted the $61.5 billion funding agreement with its subsidiary, LTL Management LLC, in order to create a false sense of financial distress and validate the unit’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group asserts this action is equivalent to a fraudulent transfer of the right to compensation for victims. They intend to investigate J&J’s actions following of the decision to dismiss the LTL’s bankruptcy case in its first instance.

May 10 2023 Update: Next week next week, this week the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments on a motion to dismiss the second bankruptcy filing of J&J LTL Management, J&J’s subsidiary. LTL Management. In the meantime, however, LTL Management has filed an Order that requires both parties to take part in a second settlement mediation to see if the global settlement can be brokered.

May 5 2023 Update: Talc producer Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to numerous lawsuits alleging its talc products cause cancer due to asbestos exposure. Talc settlements. Over 2,700 individuals have sued the firm and the company was spending $1 million a month to defend itself. The company’s recent $29 million settlement on the state of South Carolina forced it to pursue bankruptcy protection, and arguing that assets should be distributed in an equitable manner between the claimants of talc instead of being taken by the receiver. Other talc suppliers have also been forced to file for bankruptcy as a result of legal proceedings.

May 4, 2023 Update: U.S. bankruptcy judge Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to relaunch talks with lawyers who turned down the company’s $8.9 billion offer for settlement. It was in Trenton, New Jersey yesterday the parties appeared before a judge to discuss next steps for another bankruptcy proceeding and Judge Kaplan pushed more settlement talks.

This is the answer to resolve the claims of J&J. A baby powder settlement could get done. Talc settlements. But it’ll need additional money – perhaps billions of dollars – of Johnson & Johnson.

Lawyers are divided on whether to accept the proposal and not every client sees this issue the same way their lawyer views it. A second bankruptcy proceeding is bound to be a failure and Judge Kaplan has set a date for a hearing in June to decide whether to close the case for the third time.

May 3, 2023 Update A group of cancer patients who have sued Johnson & Johnson (J&J) requested an order from J&J’s Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it attempts to block litigation regarding talc-related products. The committee representing talc claimants submitted a motion on Tuesday asking for the Third Circuit to consider their case and then send it back the lower court with instructions to discharge the bankruptcy. Talc settlements. They also asked that the lawsuit against the halted torts of J&J be allowed to continue.
LTL applied for Chapter 11 protection once again following its bankruptcy filing that was denied by the Third Circuit earlier this year, offering the possibility of an $8.9 billion settlement. The committee says that the recent ruling which allowed LTL’s third Chapter 11 to continue, in addition to halting trials against J&J should be subject to the immediate Third Circuit review. The US Trustee has also requested be the New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s global vice-president of litigation, Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg declaring that J&J plans to file a statement to the appeals court calling the request an “desperate and legally inadequate move” by a few of law firms with competing financial interests.
May 1, 2023 Update: One frequently asked question is how plaintiffs and their lawyers turn down $8.9 billion. Of course, that is an enormous amount of money. But there are plenty of victims. Talc settlements. And these are really good claims for plaintiffs. We were reminded of this last week with two talc trials have resulted in huge verdicts for plaintiffs. In February mesothelioma cases, a talcum powder trial in Oregon resulted in an award of $18.1 million. The following month, a second mesothelioma-related talc case went to hearing at South Carolina and resulted in a verdict of $29million for the plaintiff. In both instances, the defendant was Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc. One of the largest suppliers of talc in the U.S.
April 30 2023 Update: J&J first tried to bring the talcum powder litigation into bankruptcy, it came with an offer to reserve $2 billion to settle the case. The amount was absurdly low. None of the talc plaintiffs were in favor of it. This time, however, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 in the event that the talc victims agree to a bankruptcy settlement and they have the backing of a significant portion of the talc plaintiffs and their lawyers. Talc settlements. But with 75% of talc plaintiffs, which is needed for approval of the bankruptcy plan It’s a long and difficult process because of the number of lawyers who have vast inventory of baby powder litigations opposed in favor of the deal.

What can be done to end the impasse? More billions.
April 25 2023 Update Talc cancer claimants have asked a judge to reject the Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a ridiculously made-up Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, insisting that the company is not financially distressed. LTL has filed for Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby-powders caused cancer. Talc settlements. LTL was denied Chapter 11 in January. 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January, saying the company was not eligible to receive bankruptcy relief because it was unable to demonstrate financial trouble.

The claimants contend that LTL’s 2nd Chapter 11 case is an overreach of the bankruptcy system and that it’s being pursued in bad faith. J&J says the bankruptcy settlement has “significant support” from firms representing an estimated 60,000 people who are claiming. It’s fair to say that plaintiffs’ lawyers and victims ‘ lawyers are divided on this $8.9 billion offer for settlement.

April 21st, 2023 Update A bankruptcy judge has ruled that Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits alleging that it sold baby powder that was contaminated and causing cancer. Even though trials for the talc lawsuits have been suspended for at least 60 days but new lawsuits can be filed, and lawyers will begin preparing their cases. Talc settlements. Judges expressed skepticism about J&J’s absurd attempt to revive its plan with the second bankruptcy case.

April 13 2023 Update: The most important announcement is an $8.9 billion over the course of 25 years settlement offer. Lawyers representing cancer victims in the MDL class action have promised to challenge the settlement the talc claimants. Why? They believe it’s too little money for the 70 000 cancer patients. Talc settlements. These lawyers believe that J&J should negotiate a bigger settlement or litigate individuals’ claims if the current bankruptcy is declared unconstitutional.

But there’s a separate group of lawyers that is not part of the leadership of that class action. These lawyers have amassed many thousands of cases. The group is seeking to settle for what is believed to be less than these victims deserve. Their argument seems to be twofold. First, they argue that the settlement, which is about an average of $100,000 per plaintiff – is fair.

This argument isn’t easy to prove. But their second argument has more force: the victims can be no longer patient and demand to get their money right now.

April 12 2023 Update: Some people are asking how J&J could file for bankruptcy again. The answer is complex and convoluted. But let’s try to explain it in simple terms.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only means to deal with both present and future lawsuits involving talc conclusively. It believes that it will be less expensive when there is the bankruptcy element which applies pressure for a settlement. Talc settlements. Going back to the 400-year span of American time, the business believes that bankruptcy is beneficial to everyone by dispersing settlement payments more evenly and effectively than trial courts, in which some litigants receive substantial payouts, while others are left with nothing.

The basic tenet of this 3rd Circuit decision was this is not a case of the profit-making company that has subsidiaries to meet the legal responsibility and declare bankruptcy – something Congress thought of when drafting its Bankruptcy Code. However, the court also ruled that the entity was financially distress because J&J assured it of unlimited funding.
So J&J did not hesitate to take advantage of the funding unlimited part of the holding and didn’t make any promises to offer unlimited funding for litigation. J&J claims that its revised financing arrangements with its subsidiary address appeals court’s concerns, while providing funds for claims. As if offering victims lesser money could solve the problem at hand.

Lawyers representing cancer victims who do not agree with the agreement counter this argument by saying that it is countering legal nonsense legal absurdity: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion in assets away from LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s ruling. The hyperbole wasn’t spared the lawyers representing victims call this the biggest “fraudulent move of assets in United States history.”

Despite the legal jargon, J&J does not really believe that this bankruptcy will last. However, it’s a means of trying to push this $8.9 billion settlement and keep the pressure on plaintiffs.

April 10, 2023 update: Bloomberg provides an insightful report on a brand new law within New Jersey that is shedding new light on the funding of litigation in the Class action suit. Funders of litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson (J&J) over talc products in exchange for a share of any settlements. J&J has now offered to pay $8.9 billion to settle any lawsuits.

The involvement of the funders is public knowledge due to the New Jersey court rule requiring the release of certain details regarding outside funding backers. The rules aim to address the rising calls for regulation of litigation funders. J&J has to deal with more than 60,000 lawsuits when you take into account state and federal infant powder litigation. Third-party financing in mass tort cases is not without its pros and pros and. There is no doubt that we are seeing how third-party funding could level the playing field between individual and big corporations in court.

April 4, 2023 Update: It is interesting to watch the worm turning in this legal battle. J&J has taken another blow this week, when an appeals court in the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to maintain the automatic stay in the meantime that J&J appeals a bankruptcy ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court. It has froze thousands of talcum cases and prevented new lawsuits from being filed ever since J&J began the controversial plan to spin talc-related liabilities off into a bankrupt subsidiary more than one year in the past. Talc settlements. When the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was not legal only a few months back, the stay was lifted. J&J had hoped to have it continued pending hearing the SCOTUS appeal. But, no.
April 1, 2023 Update: Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. The likelihood that of the Supreme Court is willing even to consider the appeal? Low.
March 16th 2023 Update: With the bankruptcy stay now officially lifted, the first new cases were filed and incorporated into the talcum powder class action MDL in the space of a year. Seven new talc lawsuits have been brought into the MDL during the month of March and brought the total number of cases that are pending to 37,522.

February 25 2023 Update This morning, a Congressmen from Tennessee has now demanded that be the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) launch an investigation into how much J&J talc products have cost the government in the many years.
A recent email addressed to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) claimed that J&J of ignoring the risks of its talc-based products for decades while tax dollars were utilized to treat people injured by exposure to the products. The demand comes just weeks after J&J’s loss to the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Talc settlements. J&J must begin making reasonable settlement offers to victims to begin in putting this behind it. This is a disgrace to one of the top companies.

February 14 2023 Update: At a hearing today at the hearing in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention following the ruling of 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.