Talcum Powder Lawsuit Scientific Evidence – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?

You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Talcum powder lawsuit scientific evidence. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

J&J’s proposed settlement for talc would make payments of 400 million dollars to US state AGs. Talcum Powder Lawsuit Scientific Evidence .

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has set aside $400 million to resolve U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of a broad $8.9 billion effort to settle allegations that it’s Baby Powder and other talc product causes cancer. Talcum powder lawsuit scientific evidence.

J&J subsidiary LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday that describes how the company will pay various types of cancer victims as part of the bankruptcy settlement. Talcum powder lawsuit scientific evidence. J&J has claimed that its Talc products are safe and do not cause cancer. It’s trying for the second time to end more than 38,000 lawsuits brought in bankruptcy, as well as prevent new lawsuits from arising in the near future.
The bankruptcy plan of LTL would pay $400 million into an additional trust to settle claims brought with state attorneys general alleging that J&J had violated states’ unfair practices and consumer protection laws through misleading consumers about the security of its talc-based products.

Some states had started consumer protection lawsuits against J&J prior to LTL’s bankruptcy filing prevented those investigations from moving forward in 2021. Talcum powder lawsuit scientific evidence. New Mexico and Mississippi had already initiated suits against Johnson & Johnson before then and the states of Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued subpoenas or civil investigative demands according to court documents.

 

 

New Mexico and Mississippi have taken steps to halt the bankruptcy of LTL along with cancer sufferers and their counterparts from the U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog. They argue that a profit-making business like J&J cannot benefit from bankruptcy protections aimed at the struggling debtors.
The company’s initial attempt to resolve the lawsuits in bankruptcy was dismissed after similar arguments, when a U.S. appellate court ruled that LTL wasn’t in “financial financial distress” and therefore not eligible of bankruptcy protection. Talcum powder lawsuit scientific evidence. LTL made a new bankruptcy application in just two hours following the dismissal, saying that the second bankruptcy was different because it was able to borrow less and had more support for a settlement.

New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion to dismiss that LTL’s bankruptcy renewal violates the law enforcement powers of the state in attempting to unilaterally limit the company’s liability for state consumer protection measures.

 

Talcum Powder Lawsuit Scientific Evidence

LTL’s recent filings also provided more information on how the company plans to evaluate and settle cancer claims if the bankruptcy plan is approved.

The maximum amount under the settlement would be $500,000 for people diagnosed with mesothelioma terminal prior to the age of 45, and $260,000 for people diagnosed with terminal ovarian cancer prior to age 45.

From there, the proposed settlement offers discounts based on the nature and severity of cancer, the patient’s age, previous the use of talc, and other aspects. Talcum powder lawsuit scientific evidence. For instance an individual who was using talc products on a weekly basis, who had a family history of ovarian cancer and was diagnosed stage II ovarian cancer when she was 55 might qualify for a $21,125 payout under the program.

Judge orders J&J and talc opponents take part in settlement talks.

Following another hearing in Johnson and Johnson’s efforts to implement a Texas Two-Step bankruptcy strategy to resolve talc litigation, federal bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the company and those opposed to the plan to hold negotiations to settle the matter, Bloomberg reports.

With its second bankruptcy bid for LTL Management–a subsidiary established by J&J to settle claims – the company offered a settlement of $8.9 billion. Talcum powder lawsuit scientific evidence. While a firm representing plaintiffs supports the deal, another group opposes the move.

This week, the opposition group, called”The Official Committee of Talc Claimants requested the bankruptcy court to dismiss this case saying that LTL is not a factor in financial distress.

“The filing is an incredibly legal and ineffective attempt by a small number of law firms to block claimants from voting on the resolution plan – a plan the vast majority of claimants approve of,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in a statement. Talcum powder lawsuit scientific evidence. “The law firms that are behind these filings have interests in finance that conflict with, diverge from, and are in opposition to the interests which their clientele. We’ll soon submit a response to the appellate court.”

Talcum powder lawsuit scientific evidence. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM who boasts more than mesothelioma clients who have sued J&J and J&J, has said that the second bankruptcy attempt of J&J will fail.

“J&J sends out press releases describing how fantastic its plans are, but is demanding that plan details–including what each sick person will receive–be kept secret,” Thompson said in a statement. “What is J&J’s plan to hide?”

 

Image Talcum Powder Lawsuit Lawyers

 

Kaplan has instructed both sides to develop a new strategy for reorganization, under supervision and supervision of mediators.

As of February 2022 Kaplan affirmed the ability of J&J’s use of Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that would release J&J from the tens of thousands of claims concerning its talcum products.

However, in the month of January, a federal appeals court ruled against the decision, ruling that the firm could not be considered in “financial trouble.”

The J&J’s plan to challenge the U.S. Supreme Court was denied at the end of April J&J applied for its first bankruptcy roughly two hours later. In response to that move, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 days in order to determine whether to allow an additional bankruptcy.

J&J’s unstoppable profit engine sputters after $6.9B settlement charge for talc.

Through Two Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has purchased 19 months of which cases have been in limbo. Talcum powder lawsuit scientific evidence. The company is requesting that claimants take a vote to accept their settlement. J&J would need 75% approval in order for the agreement to be accepted.

In addition to the group of talc attorneys who have panned the company’s bankruptcy as well, the U.S. Trustee, a branch from the U.S. Department of Justice has also filed an appeal to dismiss LTL’s second bankruptcy.

In a filing this week, U.S. trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the doors of bankruptcy are “open to honest, but naive debtors.” The doors “are not open to parties that don’t have a legitimate bankruptcy purpose or that seek to abuse the bankruptcy process to hinder or delay their creditors,” Vara continued.

To its credit, J&J maintains there is no proof conclusive that their talc products, including the famous baby powder, cause cancer. J&J has taken the products of the market first to be available in North America in 2020–and the remainder of the globe later this year.

J&J intends to steer clear of the cost of going to court. It has won the majority of cases decided in court, however some losses have been harsh.
A high-profile trial in Missouri produced a $4.7 billion verdict against the drugmaker that was later reduced to $2.1 billion after appeals.

Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
In all, J&J has lost nine trial involving talc that are on appeal or have been resolved. Out of 41 trials 32 of them ended in the favor of J&J, a mistrial or verdict for a plaintiff that was overturned on appeal. Talcum powder lawsuit scientific evidence. The company also in 2020 negotiated to settle around 1000 cases for $110 million. Bloomberg stated at the time.

 

Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Talcum Powder Lawsuit Scientific Evidence

Our lawyers handle the baby powder litigation in every state. The talcum powder lawsuits in the case of Johnson & Johnson have been ongoing for years. Talcum powder lawsuit scientific evidence. The lawsuits contend that the prolonged use of talcum powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient in products such as Baby Powder or Shower to Shower, can cause ovarian cancer among some women.

This page gives the J&J Talc Power Update and examines how the coming bankruptcy ruling affects the final settlement amount of the cases of ovarian cancer.

Have you reached the deadline by which you to bring a talcum lawsuit? Many people who think the statute of limitations has passed to sue Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Call us today at 800-553-8082 or request a no-cost and quick case review online.

 

Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Talcum Powder Lawsuit Scientific Evidence

June 2 2023 Update: At the asbestos talc trial at the trial in California yesterday, some technical issues interrupted the opening statement by the defense attorneys. Talcum powder lawsuit scientific evidence. Jurors from their homes via Zoom, did hear Johnson & Johnson’s lawyer voice his doubt about the 70s research that claimed asbestos was present in their product prior to the trial was abruptly closed.

Meanwhile, the plaintiff could present an initial witness Arthur Langer. Langer explained that the existence of other minerals with talc is inevitable. He also testified that his team had notified J&J in the year 1971 about the presence of asbestos chrysotile in the company’s talc, albeit with lower than 0.1 percent. He also discovered more asbestos in 1976.

June 1, 2023 Update: Talcum powder lawsuit scientific evidence. The first trial since J&J made the decision to split its talc division and declare bankruptcy marks a pivotal moment of the ongoing litigation story. Trial started on Monday in the poignant case of a young 24-year-old plaintiff, diagnosed with an aggressive and rare form of mesothelioma earlier this year. an illness that lawyers on both sides of the argument agree is a tragedy of a different kind.

The opening statements exposed the distinct differences between each side’s narrative. The attorney representing the plaintiff aimed his ire on Johnson & Johnson, alleging the use of deceitful strategies in its research practices as well as throughout the litigation procedure. According to the attorney, Johnson & Johnson attempted to alter the definition of asbestos, despite internal documents dating back to between 1978 and 1994 that showed fibers discovered in the tissues of the plaintiff are part of.

Johnson & Johnson’s precarious $8.9 billion settlement proposal hangs in the balance as we course of this trial. Despite the unique nature of this mesothelioma case and its distinct issues compared to other talcum powder lawsuits, a verdict favoring the plaintiff could result in an enormous setback for J&J’s hopes for broad acceptance of their settlement proposal among plaintiffs.

May 31st 2023 Update: Johnson & Johnson’s bankrupt talc division strongly defended their Second Chapter 11 filing in the facing challenges from the talc injury plaintiffs. In a written objection to the New Jersey bankruptcy court, J&J’s subsidiary claimed that the situation was vastly different from the prior filing. It highlighted the extraordinary commitment to $8.9 billion in settlement from J&J, the largest ever settlement in an bankruptcy case involving mass torts. Talcum powder lawsuit scientific evidence. It was not mentioned how the size of the settlement implies that it is an equitable settlement. J&J also claimed support from several plaintiffs’ legal companies representing over 600,00 claimants. It is difficult to confirm but it’s likely to be false.

May 24, 2023 Update: Since Johnson & Johnson’s 2021 bankruptcy filing, the first trial concerning its cosmetic talc products that are believed to containing asbestos is set to begin jury selection on Monday in California in Alameda County Superior Court, a historically good court for plaintiffs. The plaintiff claims his mesothelioma resulted from asbestos exposure in J&J’s product and that the company denies. The trial also includes six retailers accused of selling talc products.

May 22nd, 2023 Update: Lawyers involved in the 2nd J&J talc bankruptcy are now in a dispute over who should be appointed to the position of future claims representative. This is an important role critical to resolving talc claims. Talcum powder lawsuit scientific evidence. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who frequently appears in MDLs across the country, was appointed as the claims representative in the previous bankruptcy. J&J’s defense attorneys want Ellis to be named to the position in the future, however lawyers representing the talc plaintiffs have raised objections because Ellis has conflicts of interest which should stop her from being appointed to that post once more. The dispute stems from possibility that Ellis was involved in the creation of the hotly litigated second bankruptcy, which raises concerns about her ability to be neutral. In reality, this bankruptcy will likely to be dismissed in the end.

May 17, 2023 Update The pretend company J&J put together to settle the talc litigation bankruptcy informed the New Jersey bankruptcy court that they have set aside $400 million to settle the claims of states that accuse J&J of misleading marketing regarding its talc products. Talcum powder lawsuit scientific evidence. So that makes it an $8.5 billion settlement for cancer victims. It is hard to imagine the scenario in which J&J can get the settlements of baby powder through with these numbers. While J&J’s proposed $8.5 billion offer might seem like a lot of money at first, it does not look very appealing when you do the math. This settlement proposal – by our rough calculations, would not pay victims much more than an average settlement $100,000 per case. That is not enough.

May 15 2023 Update: J&J is potentially facing a lawsuit from an advocacy group that represents cancer patients. Talcum powder lawsuit scientific evidence. The group claims that J&J intentionally canceled an $61.5 billion fund-raising agreement in conjunction with its affiliate, LTL Management LLC, to create the appearance of financial hardship and confirm the unit’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group claims that this move is equivalent to a fraudulent transfer of the rights of victims’ compensation. They intend to investigate J&J’s actions in the wake of the decision to dismiss LTL’s first bankruptcy suit.

May 10 2023 Update: During the next week, next week, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments on a motion to dismiss the second bankruptcy petition filed of J&J LTL Management, J&J’s subsidiary. LTL Management. In the meantime, however, LTL Management has filed an order requiring both sides to participate in a new settlement mediation in the hope that an international settlement agreement can be come to fruition.

May 5 2023 Update: Talc supplier Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to numerous lawsuits alleging its talc products cause cancer due to asbestos exposure. Talcum powder lawsuit scientific evidence. Over 2700 people have sued the firm, and it was paying $1 million per month for legal defense. The company’s recent $29million settlement that was handed down in South Carolina forced it to file for bankruptcy protection, arguing that assets should be distributed in an equitable manner between talc claimants rather than being seized by the receiver. Other suppliers of talc have declared bankruptcy because of lawsuits.

May 4, 2023 Update: U.S. Court of Bankruptcy Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to relaunch talks on settlement with lawyers who rejected the company’s $8.9 billion settlement offer. It was in Trenton, New Jersey yesterday the parties appeared in court to discuss the next steps for the second bankruptcy case. Judge Kaplan pushed more settlement talks.

This is the way to resolve the claims of J&J. The baby powder settlement is likely to get done. Talcum powder lawsuit scientific evidence. However, it’ll require more money, more billions of dollars of Johnson & Johnson.

Lawyers are divided over whether or not to accept the plan and not all clients see the issue in the same manner their attorney does. The second bankruptcy case is expected to fail, with Judge Kaplan has set a date for a hearing in June to determine whether to dismiss the bankruptcy for the second time.

May 3 2023 Update A group of cancer victims who are suing Johnson & Johnson (J&J) demanded for they request that the Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it attempts to block litigation over talc products. The group representing the claimants made a motion Tuesday asking that the Third Circuit to consider their case and then send it back the lower court with instructions to dismiss the bankruptcy. Talcum powder lawsuit scientific evidence. They also asked that lawsuit against the halted torts of J&J continue to proceed.
LTL requested Chapter 11 protection once again after its first bankruptcy filing was rejected in the Third Circuit earlier this year, offering the possibility of an $8.9 billion payment. The committee believes that the recent ruling allowing LTL’s 2nd Chapter 11 to continue, while also halting trials against J&J, warrants immediate Third Circuit review. The US Trustee requested be the New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s worldwide vice president of litigation, Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg saying that J&J plans to file a formal response in the appeals court, declaring the filing an “desperate and legally inadequate attempt” by a handful of law firms who have conflicts of financial interests.
May 1 2023 Update: One frequently asked question is how could the plaintiffs’ lawyers and their clients turn off $8.9 billion. Of course, that’s an immense amount of money. But there are a lot of victims. Talcum powder lawsuit scientific evidence. And these are really good cases for plaintiffs. We were reminded of this recently when two talc cases ended in large verdicts for plaintiffs. In February mesothelioma, a talcum-based powder trial in Oregon was settled with a verdict worth $18.1 million. The following month, a second mesothelioma trial involving talc was held for trials within South Carolina and resulted in a verdict of $29million on behalf of the plaintiff. Both cases were defended by Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc., one of the top producers of talc in the U.S.
April 30th 2023 Update: J&J initially tried to take the lawsuit over talcum powder into bankruptcy, they came with an offer to put aside $2 billion to settle the case. This was an absurdly low amount. The talc plaintiffs had not believed in the proposal. However, this time, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 if the talc plaintiffs accept a bankruptcy settlement and they have the backing of a significant part of the talc-related plaintiffs and their attorneys. Talcum powder lawsuit scientific evidence. But 75% of the plaintiffs who are a talc, which is required to approve bankruptcy plans is not an easy task with so many lawyers with huge inventory of baby powder-related lawsuits, opposed towards the agreement.

What can be done to end the impasse? More billions.
April 25, 2023 Update Talc cancer claimants have requested a judge to dismiss the Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a ridiculously made-up Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, declaring that the company isn’t financially troubled. LTL filed for Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby products caused cancer. Talcum powder lawsuit scientific evidence. It was the 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January and said that the company wasn’t eligible for bankruptcy relief because it was unable to demonstrate financial trouble.

The plaintiffs argue that the Second Chapter 11 case is an overreach of the bankruptcy system, and that it is being pursued in bad good faith. J&J says the bankruptcy settlement is backed by “significant support” from the firms that represent around 60,000 plaintiffs. It is fair to say plaintiffs’ lawyers and victims ‘ lawyers are not united over this $8.9 billion amount of settlement offered.

April 21, 2023 Update: A bankruptcy judge decided that Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits claiming that the company offered a baby powder with a contaminant that caused cancer. Although trials for Talc lawsuits are suspended for at least 60 days but new lawsuits can be filed, and lawyers will begin preparing their cases. Talcum powder lawsuit scientific evidence. Judges expressed skepticism about J&J’s attempt to relaunch its strategy in the second bankruptcy case.

April 13th, 2023 Update: biggest news is the $8.9 billion over the next 25 years settlement offer. Lawyers representing cancer victims within MDL class action MDL group action promised to challenge the settlement the talc claimants. Why? They argue that it’s not enough money for 70 000 cancer patients. Talcum powder lawsuit scientific evidence. The lawyers say that J&J should negotiate a bigger settlement or pursue individuals’ claims if the current bankruptcy is dismissed.

However, there is a second lawyer group that isn’t part of the top leadership in group action. These lawyers have collectively amassed many thousands of cases. This group wants to settle the case now for what is believed to be far less than what these victims deserve. Their argument appears to be two-fold. First, they argue the settlement – which amounts to an average of $100,000 per plaintiff – is fair.

That is a hard argument to prove. However, their second argument has more force: victims should now not wait and they want the money immediately.

April 12 2023 Update: Some people are wondering if J&J could file for bankruptcy again. The answer is complicated and convoluted. Let’s try to clarify the issue in a simple way.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only way to settle both present and future talc lawsuits conclusively. It thinks it will pay less when there is an element of bankruptcy that puts pressure for a settlement. Talcum powder lawsuit scientific evidence. Moving past the 400-year span of American time, the business argues that bankruptcy benefits all parties because it distributes settlements more equally and more efficiently than trial courts where litigants are awarded significant settlements while others get nothing.

The gist of this 3rd Circuit decision was this is not a matter of the profit-making company that has an entity to assume the legal liability and declare bankruptcy, which is what Congress considered when it was drafting the Bankruptcy Code. It also clarified that the entity was in financial crisis due to the fact that J&J assured it of unlimited funding.
Thus, J&J jumped on the funding unlimited part of the deal and didn’t promise to provide unlimited funding for the litigation. The company claims that revised financing arrangements with its subsidiary address appeals court’s concerns while still offering funds to pay claims. As if providing victims with less money would solve the problem at hand.

Lawyers representing cancer patients who oppose the agreement counter this by arguing that the plaintiff is countering legal nonsense legal nonsense: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion of assets from LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s earlier ruling. Hyperbole is not exempt attorneys representing the victims claim it the largest “fraudulent move in United States history.”

Notwithstanding the legal mumbo jumbo, J&J does not really think this bankruptcy will survive. But it is a way of trying to push this $8.9 billion settlement and keep the pressure on plaintiffs.

April 10, 2023 Update Bloomberg provides an insightful article about a new law in New Jersey that is shedding new light on the funding of litigation in the baby powder plaintiffs in the class action. The funders who fund litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of claims in the case of Johnson & Johnson (J&J) over talc products in exchange in exchange for a portion of settlements. J&J is now willing that it will pay $8.9 billion to settle any lawsuits.

The involvement of the funders is public knowledge due to the New Jersey court rule requiring the disclosure of certain information regarding outside funding backers. The law is designed to tackle the growing demands for the regulation of litigation funders. J&J has to deal with more than 60,000 lawsuits when you include state and federal Baby Powder lawsuits. Third-party funding of mass tort cases has pros and pros and. However, there is no doubt that we are seeing how third-party financing can help level the playing field for individuals as well as large corporations in court.

April 4 2023 Update: It is fun to watch the worm turn in this case. J&J took another hit this week when they were denied by the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to extend the automatic stay during the time that J&J appeals an order granting bankruptcy to the U.S. Supreme Court. Automatic stays have stopped the cases of talcum powder in a number of years and stopped any new lawsuits from being filed ever since J&J initiated the controversial effort to spin the talc liabilities into a bankrupt entity over one year back. Talcum powder lawsuit scientific evidence. After it was decided that the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was not valid just a few months ago the stay was revoked. J&J had hoped to have it stayed in place until hearing the SCOTUS appeal. The answer was no.
April 1st, 2023 Update: Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. The chance the Supreme Court is willing even to accept the appeal? Low.
March 16 2023 Update: with the bankruptcy stay now officially lifted, the first new cases have been filed and transferred into the talcum powder class action MDL within a year. Seven new talc lawsuits have been brought into the MDL during the month of March and brought the total number of pending cases up to 37,522.

February 25 2023 Update: A Congressmen from Tennessee has now demanded that be the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) start an investigation into the cost J&J Talc products have cost the government in the decades.
Recently, in an open letter addressed to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) accused J&J of failing to recognize the dangers of its talc-based products for many years, while tax dollars were spent treating those injured by exposure to the product. The suit comes just a few days after J&J’s loss to the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Talcum powder lawsuit scientific evidence. J&J needs to start making reasonable settlement proposals to victims, in order the process of putting all this behind. This is a blemish on one of the world’s greatest firms.

February 14 2023 Update: In an appearance today in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention in light of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.

 

You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Talcum powder lawsuit scientific evidence. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

 

  • Talc In Pills Safe – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • File For A Divorce Online In Cortland Ny – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Clubman Pinaud Talc Safe – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • Talc Ovarian Cancer Study – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • Get A Copy Of My Divorce Decree Online – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Online Divorce California Same Sex Marriage – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • What Does It Cost To Do A Do It Yourself Divorce In Florida – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Ovarian Cancer Misdiagnosis Claims – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • How Long Do You Have To Be Separated Before Filing For Divorce In Florida – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • How Are Talc Gypsum And Asbestos Related – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  •  

  • Finding A Good Divorce Lawyer
  • Disclosure
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact
  • Free Do It Yourself Divorce Forms
  •  

    >>> Talcum Powder Lawsuit Scientific Evidence

    You May Also Like